Search Results - "Fletcher SW"

Authors trust in the peer review process.

Authors: Mukhida, Sahjid Das, Nikunja Kumar Patil, Rajashri et al.

Source: Journal of Dr. YSR University of Health Sciences. Apr-Jun2024, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p185-186. 2p.

A scoping review of outcome selection and accuracy of conclusions in complex digital health interventions for young people (2017–2023): methodological proposals for population health intervention research.

Authors: Collin, Claire Eyraud, Clara Martin, Philippe et al.

Source: BMC Medicine. 7/2/2025, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p1-17. 17p.

Peer Review as a Professional Obligation: Steps and Tips to Becoming a High-Quality Reviewer.

Authors: Johnson, Peter N. Miller, Jamie L.

Source: Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2024, Vol. 29 Issue 6, p570-577. 8p.

To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer.

Authors: Regehr, Glenn Bordage, Georges

Source: Medical Education. Sep2006, Vol. 40 Issue 9, p832-839. 8p.

Subjects: Medical education, Editorials, Periodicals, Authorship, Professional peer review

Geographic Terms: United Kingdom

What Affects Authors’ and Editors’ Use of Reporting Guidelines? Findings from an Online Survey and Qualitative Interviews.

Authors: Fuller, Thomas Pearson, Mark Peters, Jaime et al.

Source: PLoS ONE. Apr2015, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p1-21. 21p.

Metrics and methods in the evaluation of prestige bias in peer review: A case study in computer systems conferences.

Authors: Frachtenberg, Eitan McConville, Kelly S.

Source: PLoS ONE. 2/25/2022, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p1-29. 29p.

The validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLC) for pharmacy technicians.

Authors: Akrawi, Narin Rietdijk, Wim J.R. Koch, Birgit C.P. et al.

Source: PLoS ONE. 9/29/2025, Vol. 20 Issue 9, p1-14. 14p.

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review.

Authors: Parmanne, Piitu Laajava, Joonas Järvinen, Noora et al.

Source: Research Integrity & Peer Review. 10/24/2023, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p1-7. 7p.

Authors, Reviewers, and Publishers- The Ecosystem for Scientific Documentation: Is this Enough?

Authors: Chandra, P Chandra, P Sarat

Source: Neurology India. Nov/Dec2021, Vol. 69 Issue 6, p1516-1517. 2p.

A mixed-methods study of students' research assignments of a Master's in the clinical epidemiology programme.

Authors: Kallon, I. I. Young, T. McCaul, M.

Source: African Journal of Health Professions Education. Jun2025, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p84-89. 6p.

On the effectiveness of the scientific peer-review system: a case study of the Journal of High Energy Physics.

Authors: Sikdar, Sandipan Tehria, Paras Marsili, Matteo et al.

Source: International Journal on Digital Libraries; Jun2020, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p93-107, 15p, 1 Diagram, 7 Charts, 15 Graphs

Should peer reviewers be suggested by authors?

Authors: Fawzi, Mounir H.¹

Source: Middle East Current Psychiatry. Oct2012, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p197-199. 3p.

Magnification Independent Breast Cancer Analysis Using Vision Transformer.

Authors: Tariq, Shehroz Raza, Rehan Sargano, Allah Bux et al.

Source: Multimedia Tools & Applications; Feb2025, Vol. 84 Issue 5, p2029-2057, 29p

SCIENCE EDITING AND ITS EFFECT ON MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTANCE TIME.

Authors: Bailey, Misty¹ Mmcginn2@utk.edu

Source: AMWA Journal: American Medical Writers Association Journal. 2011, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p147-152. 6p. 3 Charts, 1 Graph.

How Blind is Blind Review?

Authors: Yankauer, Alfred¹

Source: American Journal of Public Health. Jul1991, Vol. 81 Issue 7, p843-845. 3p. 3 Charts.

Effectiveness of care coordination interventions delivered to stroke survivors in low and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors: Osei, Stephanopoulos Kofi Junior Danso-Appiah, Anthony

Source: PLoS ONE. 5/16/2025, Vol. 20 Issue 5, p1-14. 14p.

Imaging Characteristics of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 80 Years and Older: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors: Seyfettin, Ayça Gültekin, Serap Kantarcı, Mecit

Source: Eurasian Journal of Medicine. Dec2026, Vol. 58 Issue 4, p1-5. 5p.

A Collaborative Approach to Mentored Peer Reviews Sponsored by the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine.

Authors: Love, Jeffrey N. Merritt, Chris Ilgen, Jonathan S. et al.

Source: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health. Jan2024, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p111-116. 6p.

Patient preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review update to inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: Pillay, Jennifer Guitard, Samantha Rahman, Sholeh et al.

Source: Systematic Reviews. 5/28/2024, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1-29. 29p.

Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing.

Authors: Besançon, Lonni Rönnberg, Niklas Löwgren, Jonas et al.

Source: Research Integrity & Peer Review. 6/26/2020, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p1-11. 11p.