Stakeholder involvement for management of the coastal zone.
Saved in:
| Title: | Stakeholder involvement for management of the coastal zone. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Oen, Amy MP1 amy.oen@ngi.no, Bouma, Geiske M2, Botelho, Maria3, Pereira, Patrícia3, Haeger‐Eugensson, Marie4, Conides, Alexis5, Przedrzymirska, Joanna6, Isaksson, Ingela7, Wolf, Christina4, Breedveld, Gijs D1, Slob, Adriaan2 |
| Source: | Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management. Oct2016, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p701-710. 10p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Coastal zone management, *Environmental protection, *Lagoons, Stakeholders |
| Company/Entity: | European Union |
| Abstract: | ABSTRACT The European Union (EU) has taken the lead to promote the management of coastal systems. Management strategies are implemented by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), as well as the recent Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) Directive. Most EU directives have a strong focus on public participation; however, a recent review found that the actual involvement of stakeholders was variable. The 'Architecture and roadmap to manage multiple pressures on lagoons' (ARCH) research project has developed and implemented participative methodologies at different case study sites throughout Europe. These cases represent a broad range of coastal systems, and they highlight different legislative frameworks that are relevant for coastal zone management. Stakeholder participation processes were subsequently evaluated at 3 case study sites in order to assess the actual implementation of participation in the context of their respective legislative frameworks: 1) Byfjorden in Bergen, Norway, in the context of the WFD; 2) Amvrakikos Gulf, Greece, in the context of the MSFD; and 3) Nordre Älv Estuary, Sweden, in the context of the MSP Directive. An overall assessment of the evaluation criteria indicates that the ARCH workshop series methodology of focusing first on the current status of the lagoon or estuary, then on future challenges, and finally on identifying management solutions provided a platform that was conducive for stakeholder participation. Results suggest that key criteria for a good participatory process were present and above average at the 3 case study sites. The results also indicate that the active engagement that was initiated at the 3 case study sites has led to capacity building among the participants, which is an important intermediary outcome of public participation. A strong connection between participatory processes and policy can ensure the legacy of the intermediary outcomes, which is an important and necessary start toward more permanent resource management outcomes such as ecological and economic improvement. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:701-710. © 2016 SETAC [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | GreenFILE |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
