The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution.
Saved in:
| Title: | The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Golaz, Jean‐Christophe1 (AUTHOR) golaz1@llnl.gov, Caldwell, Peter M.1 (AUTHOR), Van Roekel, Luke P.2 (AUTHOR), Petersen, Mark R.2 (AUTHOR), Tang, Qi1 (AUTHOR), Wolfe, Jonathan D.2 (AUTHOR), Abeshu, Guta3 (AUTHOR), Anantharaj, Valentine4 (AUTHOR), Asay‐Davis, Xylar S.2 (AUTHOR), Bader, David C.1 (AUTHOR), Baldwin, Sterling A.1 (AUTHOR), Bisht, Gautam5 (AUTHOR), Bogenschutz, Peter A.1 (AUTHOR), Branstetter, Marcia4 (AUTHOR), Brunke, Michael A.6 (AUTHOR), Brus, Steven R.2 (AUTHOR), Burrows, Susannah M.7 (AUTHOR), Cameron‐Smith, Philip J.1 (AUTHOR), Donahue, Aaron S.1 (AUTHOR), Deakin, Michael8,9 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. Aug2019, Vol. 11 Issue 7, p2089-2129. 41p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Earth system science, *Meridional overturning circulation, *Sea ice, *Climate sensitivity, *Radiative forcing, *Hydrologic cycle, Horizontal wells |
| Abstract: | This work documents the first version of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) new Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv1). We focus on the standard resolution of the fully coupled physical model designed to address DOE mission‐relevant water cycle questions. Its components include atmosphere and land (110‐km grid spacing), ocean and sea ice (60 km in the midlatitudes and 30 km at the equator and poles), and river transport (55 km) models. This base configuration will also serve as a foundation for additional configurations exploring higher horizontal resolution as well as augmented capabilities in the form of biogeochemistry and cryosphere configurations. The performance of E3SMv1 is evaluated by means of a standard set of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima simulations consisting of a long preindustrial control, historical simulations (ensembles of fully coupled and prescribed SSTs) as well as idealized CO2 forcing simulations. The model performs well overall with biases typical of other CMIP‐class models, although the simulated Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation is weaker than many CMIP‐class models. While the E3SMv1 historical ensemble captures the bulk of the observed warming between preindustrial (1850) and present day, the trajectory of the warming diverges from observations in the second half of the twentieth century with a period of delayed warming followed by an excessive warming trend. Using a two‐layer energy balance model, we attribute this divergence to the model's strong aerosol‐related effective radiative forcing (ERFari+aci = −1.65 W/m2) and high equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS = 5.3 K). Plain Language Summary: The U.S. Department of Energy funded the development of a new state‐of‐the‐art Earth system model for research and applications relevant to its mission. The Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1 (E3SMv1) consists of five interacting components for the global atmosphere, land surface, ocean, sea ice, and rivers. Three of these components (ocean, sea ice, and river) are new and have not been coupled into an Earth system model previously. The atmosphere and land surface components were created by extending existing components part of the Community Earth System Model, Version 1. E3SMv1's capabilities are demonstrated by performing a set of standardized simulation experiments described by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima protocol at standard horizontal spatial resolution of approximately 1° latitude and longitude. The model reproduces global and regional climate features well compared to observations. Simulated warming between 1850 and 2015 matches observations, but the model is too cold by about 0.5 °C between 1960 and 1990 and later warms at a rate greater than observed. A thermodynamic analysis of the model's response to greenhouse gas and aerosol radiative affects may explain the reasons for the discrepancy. Key Points: This work documents E3SMv1, the first version of the U.S. DOE Energy Exascale Earth System ModelThe performance of E3SMv1 is documented with a set of standard CMIP6 DECK and historical simulations comprising nearly 3,000 yearsE3SMv1 has a high equilibrium climate sensitivity (5.3 K) and strong aerosol‐related effective radiative forcing (‐1.65 W/m2) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | GreenFILE |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: 8gh DbLabel: GreenFILE An: 138010710 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Golaz%2C+Jean‐Christophe%22">Golaz, Jean‐Christophe</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> golaz1@llnl.gov</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Caldwell%2C+Peter+M%2E%22">Caldwell, Peter M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Van+Roekel%2C+Luke+P%2E%22">Van Roekel, Luke P.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Petersen%2C+Mark+R%2E%22">Petersen, Mark R.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tang%2C+Qi%22">Tang, Qi</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wolfe%2C+Jonathan+D%2E%22">Wolfe, Jonathan D.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Abeshu%2C+Guta%22">Abeshu, Guta</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anantharaj%2C+Valentine%22">Anantharaj, Valentine</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Asay‐Davis%2C+Xylar+S%2E%22">Asay‐Davis, Xylar S.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bader%2C+David+C%2E%22">Bader, David C.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Baldwin%2C+Sterling+A%2E%22">Baldwin, Sterling A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bisht%2C+Gautam%22">Bisht, Gautam</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bogenschutz%2C+Peter+A%2E%22">Bogenschutz, Peter A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Branstetter%2C+Marcia%22">Branstetter, Marcia</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brunke%2C+Michael+A%2E%22">Brunke, Michael A.</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brus%2C+Steven+R%2E%22">Brus, Steven R.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burrows%2C+Susannah+M%2E%22">Burrows, Susannah M.</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cameron‐Smith%2C+Philip+J%2E%22">Cameron‐Smith, Philip J.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Donahue%2C+Aaron+S%2E%22">Donahue, Aaron S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Deakin%2C+Michael%22">Deakin, Michael</searchLink><relatesTo>8,9</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Advances+in+Modeling+Earth+Systems%22">Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems</searchLink>. Aug2019, Vol. 11 Issue 7, p2089-2129. 41p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Earth+system+science%22">Earth system science</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meridional+overturning+circulation%22">Meridional overturning circulation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sea+ice%22">Sea ice</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Climate+sensitivity%22">Climate sensitivity</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Radiative+forcing%22">Radiative forcing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hydrologic+cycle%22">Hydrologic cycle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Horizontal+wells%22">Horizontal wells</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This work documents the first version of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) new Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv1). We focus on the standard resolution of the fully coupled physical model designed to address DOE mission‐relevant water cycle questions. Its components include atmosphere and land (110‐km grid spacing), ocean and sea ice (60 km in the midlatitudes and 30 km at the equator and poles), and river transport (55 km) models. This base configuration will also serve as a foundation for additional configurations exploring higher horizontal resolution as well as augmented capabilities in the form of biogeochemistry and cryosphere configurations. The performance of E3SMv1 is evaluated by means of a standard set of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima simulations consisting of a long preindustrial control, historical simulations (ensembles of fully coupled and prescribed SSTs) as well as idealized CO2 forcing simulations. The model performs well overall with biases typical of other CMIP‐class models, although the simulated Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation is weaker than many CMIP‐class models. While the E3SMv1 historical ensemble captures the bulk of the observed warming between preindustrial (1850) and present day, the trajectory of the warming diverges from observations in the second half of the twentieth century with a period of delayed warming followed by an excessive warming trend. Using a two‐layer energy balance model, we attribute this divergence to the model's strong aerosol‐related effective radiative forcing (ERFari+aci = −1.65 W/m2) and high equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS = 5.3 K). Plain Language Summary: The U.S. Department of Energy funded the development of a new state‐of‐the‐art Earth system model for research and applications relevant to its mission. The Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1 (E3SMv1) consists of five interacting components for the global atmosphere, land surface, ocean, sea ice, and rivers. Three of these components (ocean, sea ice, and river) are new and have not been coupled into an Earth system model previously. The atmosphere and land surface components were created by extending existing components part of the Community Earth System Model, Version 1. E3SMv1's capabilities are demonstrated by performing a set of standardized simulation experiments described by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima protocol at standard horizontal spatial resolution of approximately 1° latitude and longitude. The model reproduces global and regional climate features well compared to observations. Simulated warming between 1850 and 2015 matches observations, but the model is too cold by about 0.5 °C between 1960 and 1990 and later warms at a rate greater than observed. A thermodynamic analysis of the model's response to greenhouse gas and aerosol radiative affects may explain the reasons for the discrepancy. Key Points: This work documents E3SMv1, the first version of the U.S. DOE Energy Exascale Earth System ModelThe performance of E3SMv1 is documented with a set of standard CMIP6 DECK and historical simulations comprising nearly 3,000 yearsE3SMv1 has a high equilibrium climate sensitivity (5.3 K) and strong aerosol‐related effective radiative forcing (‐1.65 W/m2) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=138010710 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1029/2018MS001603 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 41 StartPage: 2089 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Earth system science Type: general – SubjectFull: Meridional overturning circulation Type: general – SubjectFull: Sea ice Type: general – SubjectFull: Climate sensitivity Type: general – SubjectFull: Radiative forcing Type: general – SubjectFull: Hydrologic cycle Type: general – SubjectFull: Horizontal wells Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Golaz, Jean‐Christophe – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Caldwell, Peter M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Van Roekel, Luke P. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Petersen, Mark R. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tang, Qi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wolfe, Jonathan D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Abeshu, Guta – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Anantharaj, Valentine – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Asay‐Davis, Xylar S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bader, David C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Baldwin, Sterling A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bisht, Gautam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bogenschutz, Peter A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Branstetter, Marcia – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Brunke, Michael A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Brus, Steven R. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burrows, Susannah M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cameron‐Smith, Philip J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Donahue, Aaron S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Deakin, Michael IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Text: Aug2019 Type: published Y: 2019 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 19422466 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 11 – Type: issue Value: 7 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |