Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum).
Saved in:
| Title: | Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum). |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Nosworthy, Matthew G.1 (AUTHOR), Medina, Gerardo1 (AUTHOR), Franczyk, Adam J.1 (AUTHOR), Neufeld, Jason1 (AUTHOR), Appah, Paulyn2 (AUTHOR), Utioh, Alphonsus2 (AUTHOR), Frohlich, Peter3 (AUTHOR), Tar'an, Bunyamin4 (AUTHOR), House, James D.1,5,6,7 (AUTHOR) james.house@umanitoba.ca |
| Source: | Food Science & Nutrition. Jun2020, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p2950-2958. 9p. |
| Subject Terms: | Legumes, Chickpea, Proteins, Protein analysis, Amino acids |
| Abstract: | Chickpea is a widely produced pulse crop, but requires processing prior to human consumption. Protein bioavailability and amino acid quantity of chickpea flour can be altered by multiple factors including processing method. For this reason, the protein quality of processed chickpea flour was determined using in vivo and in vitro analyses for processed chickpeas. Processing differentially affected the protein digestibility‐corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) of chickpeas with extruded chickpea (83.8) having a higher PDCAAS score than both cooked (75.2) and baked (80.03). Interestingly, the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) value of baked chickpea (0.84) was higher compared to both extruded (0.82) and cooked (0.78). The protein efficiency ratio, another measure of protein quality, was significantly higher for extruded chickpea than baked chickpea (p <.01). In vivo and in vitro analysis of protein quality were well correlated (R2 =.9339). These results demonstrated that under certain circumstances in vitro methods could replace the use of animals to determine protein quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Food Science & Nutrition is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | GreenFILE |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: 8gh DbLabel: GreenFILE An: 143823510 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum). – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nosworthy%2C+Matthew+G%2E%22">Nosworthy, Matthew G.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Medina%2C+Gerardo%22">Medina, Gerardo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Franczyk%2C+Adam+J%2E%22">Franczyk, Adam J.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Neufeld%2C+Jason%22">Neufeld, Jason</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Appah%2C+Paulyn%22">Appah, Paulyn</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Utioh%2C+Alphonsus%22">Utioh, Alphonsus</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Frohlich%2C+Peter%22">Frohlich, Peter</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tar'an%2C+Bunyamin%22">Tar'an, Bunyamin</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22House%2C+James+D%2E%22">House, James D.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,5,6,7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> james.house@umanitoba.ca</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Food+Science+%26+Nutrition%22">Food Science & Nutrition</searchLink>. Jun2020, Vol. 8 Issue 6, p2950-2958. 9p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Legumes%22">Legumes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chickpea%22">Chickpea</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Proteins%22">Proteins</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Protein+analysis%22">Protein analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Amino+acids%22">Amino acids</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Chickpea is a widely produced pulse crop, but requires processing prior to human consumption. Protein bioavailability and amino acid quantity of chickpea flour can be altered by multiple factors including processing method. For this reason, the protein quality of processed chickpea flour was determined using in vivo and in vitro analyses for processed chickpeas. Processing differentially affected the protein digestibility‐corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) of chickpeas with extruded chickpea (83.8) having a higher PDCAAS score than both cooked (75.2) and baked (80.03). Interestingly, the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) value of baked chickpea (0.84) was higher compared to both extruded (0.82) and cooked (0.78). The protein efficiency ratio, another measure of protein quality, was significantly higher for extruded chickpea than baked chickpea (p <.01). In vivo and in vitro analysis of protein quality were well correlated (R2 =.9339). These results demonstrated that under certain circumstances in vitro methods could replace the use of animals to determine protein quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Food Science & Nutrition is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=143823510 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/fsn3.1597 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 9 StartPage: 2950 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Legumes Type: general – SubjectFull: Chickpea Type: general – SubjectFull: Proteins Type: general – SubjectFull: Protein analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Amino acids Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nosworthy, Matthew G. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Medina, Gerardo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Franczyk, Adam J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Neufeld, Jason – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Appah, Paulyn – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Utioh, Alphonsus – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Frohlich, Peter – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tar'an, Bunyamin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: House, James D. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2020 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 20487177 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 8 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Food Science & Nutrition Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |