A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes.
Authors: Callahan, Sean1,2 (AUTHOR), Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M.1,3 (AUTHOR) jmcr@umich.edu, Nagesan, Ramon S.1 (AUTHOR), Gray, Jaimi A.4 (AUTHOR), Davis Rabosky, Alison R.1,3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Ecology & Evolution (20457758). Sep2021, Vol. 11 Issue 17, p11587-11603. 17p.
Subject Terms: *Natural history, *Iodine, Computed tomography, Predation, Viperidae, Reptiles, Snakes
Abstract: Diffusible iodine‐based contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) visualizes soft tissue from micro‐CT (µCT) scans of specimens to uncover internal features and natural history information without incurring physical damage via dissection. Unlike hard‐tissue imaging, taxonomic sampling within diceCT datasets is currently limited. To initiate best practices for diceCT in a nonmodel group, we outline a guide for staining and high‐throughput µCT scanning in snakes. We scanned the entire body and one region of interest (i.e., head) for 23 specimens representing 23 species from the clades Aniliidae, Dipsadinae, Colubrinae, Elapidae, Lamprophiidae, and Viperidae. We generated 82 scans that include 1.25% Lugol's iodine stained (soft tissue) and unstained (skeletal) data for each specimen. We found that duration of optimal staining time increased linearly with body size; head radius was the best indicator. Postreconstruction of scans, optimal staining was evident by evenly distributed grayscale values and clear differentiation among soft‐tissue anatomy. Under and over stained specimens produced poor contrast among soft tissues, which was often exacerbated by user bias during "digital dissections" (i.e., segmentation). Regardless, all scans produced usable data from which we assessed a range of downstream analytical applications within ecology and evolution (e.g., predator‐prey interactions, life history, and morphological evolution). Ethanol destaining reversed the known effects of iodine on the exterior appearance of physical specimens, but required substantially more time than reported for other destaining methods. We discuss the feasibility of implementing diceCT techniques for a new user, including approximate financial and temporal commitments, required facilities, and potential effects of staining on specimens. We present the first high‐throughput workflow for full‐body skeletal and diceCT scanning in snakes, which can be generalized to any elongate vertebrates, and increases publicly available diceCT scans for reptiles by an order of magnitude. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ecology & Evolution (20457758) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 152378382
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Callahan%2C+Sean%22">Callahan, Sean</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Crowe‐Riddell%2C+Jenna+M%2E%22">Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> jmcr@umich.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nagesan%2C+Ramon+S%2E%22">Nagesan, Ramon S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gray%2C+Jaimi+A%2E%22">Gray, Jaimi A.</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Davis+Rabosky%2C+Alison+R%2E%22">Davis Rabosky, Alison R.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ecology+%26+Evolution+%2820457758%29%22">Ecology & Evolution (20457758)</searchLink>. Sep2021, Vol. 11 Issue 17, p11587-11603. 17p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Natural+history%22">Natural history</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Iodine%22">Iodine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computed+tomography%22">Computed tomography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predation%22">Predation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Viperidae%22">Viperidae</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reptiles%22">Reptiles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Snakes%22">Snakes</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Diffusible iodine‐based contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) visualizes soft tissue from micro‐CT (µCT) scans of specimens to uncover internal features and natural history information without incurring physical damage via dissection. Unlike hard‐tissue imaging, taxonomic sampling within diceCT datasets is currently limited. To initiate best practices for diceCT in a nonmodel group, we outline a guide for staining and high‐throughput µCT scanning in snakes. We scanned the entire body and one region of interest (i.e., head) for 23 specimens representing 23 species from the clades Aniliidae, Dipsadinae, Colubrinae, Elapidae, Lamprophiidae, and Viperidae. We generated 82 scans that include 1.25% Lugol's iodine stained (soft tissue) and unstained (skeletal) data for each specimen. We found that duration of optimal staining time increased linearly with body size; head radius was the best indicator. Postreconstruction of scans, optimal staining was evident by evenly distributed grayscale values and clear differentiation among soft‐tissue anatomy. Under and over stained specimens produced poor contrast among soft tissues, which was often exacerbated by user bias during "digital dissections" (i.e., segmentation). Regardless, all scans produced usable data from which we assessed a range of downstream analytical applications within ecology and evolution (e.g., predator‐prey interactions, life history, and morphological evolution). Ethanol destaining reversed the known effects of iodine on the exterior appearance of physical specimens, but required substantially more time than reported for other destaining methods. We discuss the feasibility of implementing diceCT techniques for a new user, including approximate financial and temporal commitments, required facilities, and potential effects of staining on specimens. We present the first high‐throughput workflow for full‐body skeletal and diceCT scanning in snakes, which can be generalized to any elongate vertebrates, and increases publicly available diceCT scans for reptiles by an order of magnitude. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ecology & Evolution (20457758) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=152378382
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/ece3.7467
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 17
        StartPage: 11587
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Natural history
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Iodine
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computed tomography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Predation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Viperidae
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reptiles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Snakes
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A guide for optimal iodine staining and high‐throughput diceCT scanning in snakes.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Callahan, Sean
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Crowe‐Riddell, Jenna M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nagesan, Ramon S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gray, Jaimi A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Davis Rabosky, Alison R.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 20457758
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 11
            – Type: issue
              Value: 17
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ecology & Evolution (20457758)
              Type: main
ResultId 1