View in EDS

Landscape characteristics of university campus in relation to aesthetic quality and recreational preference.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Landscape characteristics of university campus in relation to aesthetic quality and recreational preference.
Authors: Wang, Ronghua1 (AUTHOR) ronghuawang@jsnu.edu.cn, Jiang, Wuxian1 (AUTHOR), Lu, Tianshu1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Dec2021, Vol. 66, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subject Terms: *Landscapes, *Natural landscaping, Open spaces, Aesthetics, Landscape design
Geographic Terms: China
Abstract: • Campus landscape with natural waterscape and high vegetation coverage enhances the coexistence of aesthetic and recreational preference. • Campus landscape with more natural elements are suitable for passive recreational activities. • Campus hardscape is better for walking, and open space encourages gathering. • Higher aesthetic quality promotes outdoor activities, and vice versa. Campus landscape provides multifold functions, including aesthetic appreciation, recreational activities, ecological protection, etc., in which aesthetic appreciation and recreational activities are important for college students. However, the issues on which landscape characteristics can enhance the coexistence of aesthetic quality and recreational preference, thereby guiding campus landscape design, are poorly understood by existing literature. To address this knowledge gap, twenty sites of campus landscapes in Xuzhou, a medium-sized city in eastern China were selected to evaluate the aesthetic quality and recreational preference through online surveys. Then the coexistence of aesthetic quality and recreational preference was calculated. In addition, 10 landscape characteristics which were abstracted to describe the objective features of the sites were judged quantitatively. The main results indicated that: (1) campus landscape containing natural bank in waterscape had higher aesthetic quality and suitable for carrying out some passive recreational activities such as reading, meditation and enjoying the scenery; (2) landscape with more hardscapes encouraged walking and open spaces had a high potential for gathering; (3) "natural bank of water" and "percentage of vegetation coverage" were the reliable predictors for the coexistence of aesthetic quality and recreational preference; (4) the aesthetic quality of campus landscape could promote outdoor recreational activities, and vice versa. In practice, increasing vegetation coverage and natural waterscape on campus would improve both aesthetic quality and recreational preference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Urban Forestry & Urban Greening is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 153846311
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Landscape characteristics of university campus in relation to aesthetic quality and recreational preference.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Ronghua%22">Wang, Ronghua</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> ronghuawang@jsnu.edu.cn</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jiang%2C+Wuxian%22">Jiang, Wuxian</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lu%2C+Tianshu%22">Lu, Tianshu</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Urban+Forestry+%26+Urban+Greening%22">Urban Forestry & Urban Greening</searchLink>. Dec2021, Vol. 66, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Landscapes%22">Landscapes</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Natural+landscaping%22">Natural landscaping</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Open+spaces%22">Open spaces</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Aesthetics%22">Aesthetics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Landscape+design%22">Landscape design</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: • Campus landscape with natural waterscape and high vegetation coverage enhances the coexistence of aesthetic and recreational preference. • Campus landscape with more natural elements are suitable for passive recreational activities. • Campus hardscape is better for walking, and open space encourages gathering. • Higher aesthetic quality promotes outdoor activities, and vice versa. Campus landscape provides multifold functions, including aesthetic appreciation, recreational activities, ecological protection, etc., in which aesthetic appreciation and recreational activities are important for college students. However, the issues on which landscape characteristics can enhance the coexistence of aesthetic quality and recreational preference, thereby guiding campus landscape design, are poorly understood by existing literature. To address this knowledge gap, twenty sites of campus landscapes in Xuzhou, a medium-sized city in eastern China were selected to evaluate the aesthetic quality and recreational preference through online surveys. Then the coexistence of aesthetic quality and recreational preference was calculated. In addition, 10 landscape characteristics which were abstracted to describe the objective features of the sites were judged quantitatively. The main results indicated that: (1) campus landscape containing natural bank in waterscape had higher aesthetic quality and suitable for carrying out some passive recreational activities such as reading, meditation and enjoying the scenery; (2) landscape with more hardscapes encouraged walking and open spaces had a high potential for gathering; (3) "natural bank of water" and "percentage of vegetation coverage" were the reliable predictors for the coexistence of aesthetic quality and recreational preference; (4) the aesthetic quality of campus landscape could promote outdoor recreational activities, and vice versa. In practice, increasing vegetation coverage and natural waterscape on campus would improve both aesthetic quality and recreational preference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Urban Forestry & Urban Greening is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=153846311
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127389
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 1
        StartPage: N.PAG
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Landscapes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Natural landscaping
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Open spaces
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Aesthetics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Landscape design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: China
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Landscape characteristics of university campus in relation to aesthetic quality and recreational preference.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Ronghua
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jiang, Wuxian
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lu, Tianshu
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 16188667
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 66
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
              Type: main
ResultId 1