The Promise of Collective Action for Large-Scale Commons Dilemmas: Reflections on Common- Pool-Resource Theory.
Saved in:
| Title: | The Promise of Collective Action for Large-Scale Commons Dilemmas: Reflections on Common- Pool-Resource Theory. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | YODER, LANDON1 yoderl@indiana.edu, WAGNER, COURTNEY HAMMOND2, SULLIVAN-WILEY, KIRA3, SMITH, GEMMA2 |
| Source: | International Journal of the Commons. 2022, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p47-63. 17p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Environmental degradation, *Global environmental change, *Marine biodiversity, Collective action, Dilemma, Action theory (Psychology) |
| Abstract: | It has become axiomatic that collective action is core to overcoming commons dilemmas. However, the popularity of the commons dilemma framing has led to its decoupling from canonical common-pool-resource cases. This decoupling is especially problematic for theorizing under what conditions collective action would emerge to solve complex, large-scale environmental problems, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, or ocean hypoxia. We argue that there is an over-emphasis on using diagnostic tools (e.g., the design principles), which has come at the expense of theory building for non-canonical cases. Canonical cases, such as fisheries, forests, or irrigation networks, rely on situations where salience of social dilemmas arises from joint costs and benefits actors face from allocating and sustaining a shared pool of livelihood-dependent resources. By expanding the commons definition to more generally mean shared needs or benefits, such as ecosystem services, the consequences of uses in large-scale CPRs, such as pollution, become less obvious. In this paper, we argue that it is particularly urgent to generate a revised theory of collective action for these types of cases, where environmental bads are core to the social dilemma. We contend that Ostrom’s design principles represent a particular set of solutions to several interconnected and foundational aspects of group problem-solving: generating salience, achieving widespread participation, and ensuring compliance over time. We argue that reconceptualizing how particular institutional arrangements address salience, participation, and compliance can expand CPR theory’s applicability to these large-scale problems and help to clarify the role that collective action can play in solving these pressing challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Journal of the Commons is the property of Universiteit Utrecht and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | GreenFILE |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: 8gh DbLabel: GreenFILE An: 161043079 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Promise of Collective Action for Large-Scale Commons Dilemmas: Reflections on Common- Pool-Resource Theory. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22YODER%2C+LANDON%22">YODER, LANDON</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> yoderl@indiana.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22WAGNER%2C+COURTNEY+HAMMOND%22">WAGNER, COURTNEY HAMMOND</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22SULLIVAN-WILEY%2C+KIRA%22">SULLIVAN-WILEY, KIRA</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22SMITH%2C+GEMMA%22">SMITH, GEMMA</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Journal+of+the+Commons%22">International Journal of the Commons</searchLink>. 2022, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p47-63. 17p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Environmental+degradation%22">Environmental degradation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Global+environmental+change%22">Global environmental change</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Marine+biodiversity%22">Marine biodiversity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Collective+action%22">Collective action</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dilemma%22">Dilemma</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Action+theory+%28Psychology%29%22">Action theory (Psychology)</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: It has become axiomatic that collective action is core to overcoming commons dilemmas. However, the popularity of the commons dilemma framing has led to its decoupling from canonical common-pool-resource cases. This decoupling is especially problematic for theorizing under what conditions collective action would emerge to solve complex, large-scale environmental problems, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, or ocean hypoxia. We argue that there is an over-emphasis on using diagnostic tools (e.g., the design principles), which has come at the expense of theory building for non-canonical cases. Canonical cases, such as fisheries, forests, or irrigation networks, rely on situations where salience of social dilemmas arises from joint costs and benefits actors face from allocating and sustaining a shared pool of livelihood-dependent resources. By expanding the commons definition to more generally mean shared needs or benefits, such as ecosystem services, the consequences of uses in large-scale CPRs, such as pollution, become less obvious. In this paper, we argue that it is particularly urgent to generate a revised theory of collective action for these types of cases, where environmental bads are core to the social dilemma. We contend that Ostrom’s design principles represent a particular set of solutions to several interconnected and foundational aspects of group problem-solving: generating salience, achieving widespread participation, and ensuring compliance over time. We argue that reconceptualizing how particular institutional arrangements address salience, participation, and compliance can expand CPR theory’s applicability to these large-scale problems and help to clarify the role that collective action can play in solving these pressing challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of International Journal of the Commons is the property of Universiteit Utrecht and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=161043079 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.5334/ijc.1163 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 47 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Environmental degradation Type: general – SubjectFull: Global environmental change Type: general – SubjectFull: Marine biodiversity Type: general – SubjectFull: Collective action Type: general – SubjectFull: Dilemma Type: general – SubjectFull: Action theory (Psychology) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Promise of Collective Action for Large-Scale Commons Dilemmas: Reflections on Common- Pool-Resource Theory. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: YODER, LANDON – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: WAGNER, COURTNEY HAMMOND – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: SULLIVAN-WILEY, KIRA – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: SMITH, GEMMA IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Text: 2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 18750281 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 16 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of the Commons Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
