View in EDS

A pilot study comparing MEA and AEEA solvents in carbon capture.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A pilot study comparing MEA and AEEA solvents in carbon capture.
Authors: Krótki, Aleksander1 (AUTHOR) akrotki@itpe.pl, Więcław-Solny, Lucyna1 (AUTHOR), Tatarczuk, Adam1 (AUTHOR), Spietz, Tomasz1 (AUTHOR), Chwoła, Tadeusz1 (AUTHOR), Dobras, Szymon1 (AUTHOR)
Source: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. Jun2023, Vol. 126, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subject Terms: *Carbon sequestration, *Solvents, *Ethanol, *Flue gases, Pilot plants, Ethanolamines, Pilot projects, Superabsorbent polymers
Abstract: • Experimental pilot data results using an aqueous 2-(2-aminoethylamino)ethanol (AEEA) compared to ethanolamine (MEA) solution. Data provided for various flow configurations, for systems having patented interheated reboiler unskillful running of the pilot CO 2 removal process with AEEA solution can lead to excessive heat consumption, higher than for MEA. • For three different absorbent flow configurations (standard, multi absorber feed, and split flow) with AEEA solution used the lowest reboiler heat duty was obtained for the split flow system. • Running the AEEA CO 2 capture process with the split flow system almost 10 per cent point lower reboiler heat duty than for MEA at the same L/G ratio was achieved. The goal of reducing the energy consumption of the CO 2 removal process from flue gas may be pursued by modifying the process flow system, insertion of new technical solutions or developing new solvents. This paper provides data and discussion of the pilot plant experimental results using an aqueous 2-(2-aminoethylamino)ethanol (AEEA) compared to ethanolamine (MEA) solution. The post-combustion carbon capture pilot plant study was conducted with stripper inter-heating for advanced various flow systems, mainly for multi absorber feed (MAF) process setups, namely one with the lean amine stream being split 50/50 and served at different heights of the absorption column. A comparison with the standard (S) and split flow (SF) process flow modification has been also performed. The test showed that unskillful running of the process with AEEA solution can lead to excessive heat consumption, higher than for MEA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 164109828
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A pilot study comparing MEA and AEEA solvents in carbon capture.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Krótki%2C+Aleksander%22">Krótki, Aleksander</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> akrotki@itpe.pl</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Więcław-Solny%2C+Lucyna%22">Więcław-Solny, Lucyna</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tatarczuk%2C+Adam%22">Tatarczuk, Adam</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spietz%2C+Tomasz%22">Spietz, Tomasz</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chwoła%2C+Tadeusz%22">Chwoła, Tadeusz</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dobras%2C+Szymon%22">Dobras, Szymon</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Journal+of+Greenhouse+Gas+Control%22">International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control</searchLink>. Jun2023, Vol. 126, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Carbon+sequestration%22">Carbon sequestration</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Solvents%22">Solvents</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethanol%22">Ethanol</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Flue+gases%22">Flue gases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pilot+plants%22">Pilot plants</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethanolamines%22">Ethanolamines</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pilot+projects%22">Pilot projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Superabsorbent+polymers%22">Superabsorbent polymers</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: • Experimental pilot data results using an aqueous 2-(2-aminoethylamino)ethanol (AEEA) compared to ethanolamine (MEA) solution. Data provided for various flow configurations, for systems having patented interheated reboiler unskillful running of the pilot CO 2 removal process with AEEA solution can lead to excessive heat consumption, higher than for MEA. • For three different absorbent flow configurations (standard, multi absorber feed, and split flow) with AEEA solution used the lowest reboiler heat duty was obtained for the split flow system. • Running the AEEA CO 2 capture process with the split flow system almost 10 per cent point lower reboiler heat duty than for MEA at the same L/G ratio was achieved. The goal of reducing the energy consumption of the CO 2 removal process from flue gas may be pursued by modifying the process flow system, insertion of new technical solutions or developing new solvents. This paper provides data and discussion of the pilot plant experimental results using an aqueous 2-(2-aminoethylamino)ethanol (AEEA) compared to ethanolamine (MEA) solution. The post-combustion carbon capture pilot plant study was conducted with stripper inter-heating for advanced various flow systems, mainly for multi absorber feed (MAF) process setups, namely one with the lean amine stream being split 50/50 and served at different heights of the absorption column. A comparison with the standard (S) and split flow (SF) process flow modification has been also performed. The test showed that unskillful running of the process with AEEA solution can lead to excessive heat consumption, higher than for MEA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=164109828
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103891
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 1
        StartPage: N.PAG
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Carbon sequestration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Solvents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethanol
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Flue gases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pilot plants
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethanolamines
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pilot projects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Superabsorbent polymers
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A pilot study comparing MEA and AEEA solvents in carbon capture.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Krótki, Aleksander
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Więcław-Solny, Lucyna
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tatarczuk, Adam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Spietz, Tomasz
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chwoła, Tadeusz
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dobras, Szymon
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 17505836
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 126
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
              Type: main
ResultId 1