View in EDS

Important Crop Pollinators Respond Less Negatively to Anthropogenic Land Use Than Other Animals.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Important Crop Pollinators Respond Less Negatively to Anthropogenic Land Use Than Other Animals.
Authors: Williams, Jessica J.1 (AUTHOR) jessica.williams.16@ucl.ac.uk, Newbold, Tim1 (AUTHOR), Millard, Joseph2 (AUTHOR), Groner, Vivienne P.1,3 (AUTHOR), Pearson, Richard G.1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Ecology & Evolution (20457758). Nov2024, Vol. 14 Issue 11, p1-21. 21p.
Subject Terms: *Biotic communities, *Anthropogenic effects on nature, *Agricultural productivity, *Ecological impact, *Pollination, *Food crops
Abstract: Animal‐mediated pollination is a key ecosystem service required to some extent by almost three‐quarters of the leading human food crops in global food production. Anthropogenic pressures such as habitat loss and land‐use intensification are causing shifts in ecological community composition, potentially resulting in declines in pollination services and impacting crop production. Previous research has often overlooked interspecific differences in pollination contribution, yet such differences mean that biodiversity declines will not necessarily negatively impact pollination. Here, we use a novel species‐level ecosystem service contribution matrix along with mixed‐effects models to explore how groups of terrestrial species who contribute differently to crop pollination respond globally to land‐use type, land‐use intensity, and availability of natural habitats in the surrounding landscape. We find that the species whose contribution to crop pollination is higher generally respond less negatively (and in some cases positively) to human disturbance of land, compared to species that contribute less or not at all to pollination. This result may be due to these high‐contribution species being less sensitive to anthropogenic land conversions, which has led humans to being more reliant on them for crop pollination. However, it also suggests that there is potential for crop pollination to be resilient in the face of anthropogenic land conversions. With such a high proportion of food crops requiring animal‐mediated pollination to some extent, understanding how anthropogenic landscapes impact ecological communities and the consequences for pollination is critical for ensuring food security. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ecology & Evolution (20457758) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 181195470
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Important Crop Pollinators Respond Less Negatively to Anthropogenic Land Use Than Other Animals.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Williams%2C+Jessica J%2E%22">Williams, Jessica J.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> jessica.williams.16@ucl.ac.uk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Newbold%2C+Tim%22">Newbold, Tim</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Millard%2C+Joseph%22">Millard, Joseph</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Groner%2C+Vivienne P%2E%22">Groner, Vivienne P.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pearson%2C+Richard G%2E%22">Pearson, Richard G.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ecology+%26+Evolution+%2820457758%29%22">Ecology & Evolution (20457758)</searchLink>. Nov2024, Vol. 14 Issue 11, p1-21. 21p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biotic+communities%22">Biotic communities</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anthropogenic+effects+on+nature%22">Anthropogenic effects on nature</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Agricultural+productivity%22">Agricultural productivity</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ecological+impact%22">Ecological impact</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pollination%22">Pollination</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Food+crops%22">Food crops</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Animal‐mediated pollination is a key ecosystem service required to some extent by almost three‐quarters of the leading human food crops in global food production. Anthropogenic pressures such as habitat loss and land‐use intensification are causing shifts in ecological community composition, potentially resulting in declines in pollination services and impacting crop production. Previous research has often overlooked interspecific differences in pollination contribution, yet such differences mean that biodiversity declines will not necessarily negatively impact pollination. Here, we use a novel species‐level ecosystem service contribution matrix along with mixed‐effects models to explore how groups of terrestrial species who contribute differently to crop pollination respond globally to land‐use type, land‐use intensity, and availability of natural habitats in the surrounding landscape. We find that the species whose contribution to crop pollination is higher generally respond less negatively (and in some cases positively) to human disturbance of land, compared to species that contribute less or not at all to pollination. This result may be due to these high‐contribution species being less sensitive to anthropogenic land conversions, which has led humans to being more reliant on them for crop pollination. However, it also suggests that there is potential for crop pollination to be resilient in the face of anthropogenic land conversions. With such a high proportion of food crops requiring animal‐mediated pollination to some extent, understanding how anthropogenic landscapes impact ecological communities and the consequences for pollination is critical for ensuring food security. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ecology & Evolution (20457758) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=181195470
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/ece3.70486
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Biotic communities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Anthropogenic effects on nature
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Agricultural productivity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ecological impact
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pollination
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Food crops
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Important Crop Pollinators Respond Less Negatively to Anthropogenic Land Use Than Other Animals.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Williams, Jessica J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Newbold, Tim
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Millard, Joseph
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Groner, Vivienne P.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pearson, Richard G.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 20457758
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 14
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ecology & Evolution (20457758)
              Type: main
ResultId 1