View in EDS

Pluto Geologic Map: Use of Crater Data to Understand Age Relationships.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Pluto Geologic Map: Use of Crater Data to Understand Age Relationships.
Authors: Singer, K. N.1 (AUTHOR) kelsi.singer@swri.org, White, O. L.2 (AUTHOR), Greenstreet, S.3,4 (AUTHOR), Moore, J. M.5 (AUTHOR), Williams, D. A.6 (AUTHOR), Lopes, R. M. C.7 (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Geophysical Research. Planets. Jan2025, Vol. 130 Issue 1, p1-16. 16p.
Subject Terms: Kuiper belt, Geological maps, Geological mapping, Sequence stratigraphy, Solar system, Impact craters, Lunar craters
Abstract: Pluto's surface displays a wide variety of geologic units from smooth plains to extremely rugged mountainous expanses. These terrains range in age from young, actively resurfaced regions (no observable craters even in the highest‐resolution New Horizons images) to old, heavily cratered, eroded regions. Here we expand upon the crater data analysis and the independent crater data set used in the production of a 1:7M scale geologic map of Pluto that is to be published by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS). We present both relative ages based on crater spatial density (number of craters in a given size bin per km2) and quantitative ages (e.g., 2 Ga) using the estimated impactor flux onto Pluto. The techniques presented here were developed specifically for the information available from a USGS geologic map, where smaller craters are mapped as points only (no specific diameter information per crater). We developed a new type of visualization, called a distributed R‐plot, to understand the relative ages of the geologic units. The uncertainties in the current knowledge of the Kuiper belt populations and impactor flux at Pluto propagate to large uncertainties in the estimated quantitative ages (∼a factor of two). However, both relative and quantitative ages from crater analysis are valuable tools in developing the sequence of geologic events. Pluto has large areas of crater‐free young terrains (13 units making up ∼27% of mapped higher‐resolution surface area) with widely varying morphologies, indicating a variety of resurfacing mechanisms, both exogenic and endogenic, likely active in Pluto's recent past or present. Plain Language Summary: Geologic maps highlight different types of units across a body and can be useful for observing patterns and understanding the geologic history of a body. Craters form continuously across Pluto from the bombardment of other smaller Kuiper belt objects. Thus, a surface with fewer craters has likely been resurfaced. The resurfacing event could partially or completely erase craters, could happen at a more distinct point in time, or be a long‐term process. Each of these scenarios leaves different geological clues, both in the number of craters and their erosion states. A large fraction (∼30%) of the surface of Pluto observed in detail by the New Horizons spacecraft (Plutos "near‐side") is completely devoid of craters, indicating that these are very young surfaces and implying relatively recent geologic activity on Pluto. Additionally, the impact rates on Pluto have been estimated and we can get a rough idea of when in the Solar System's ∼4.5 billion year history the surfaces on Pluto likely formed. Key Points: We developed crater analysis techniques with specific applications for determining stratigraphic sequences on United States Geologic Survey geologic mapsPluto has a wide variety of both younger and older terrain types, implying ongoing activity and a diverse geologic historyYoung, crater‐free, areas with widely varying geomorphology make up a large fraction, about 30%, of Pluto's near‐side [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Geophysical Research. Planets is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 184015531
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Pluto Geologic Map: Use of Crater Data to Understand Age Relationships.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Singer%2C+K%2E+N%2E%22">Singer, K. N.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> kelsi.singer@swri.org</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22White%2C+O%2E+L%2E%22">White, O. L.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Greenstreet%2C+S%2E%22">Greenstreet, S.</searchLink><relatesTo>3,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moore%2C+J%2E+M%2E%22">Moore, J. M.</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Williams%2C+D%2E+A%2E%22">Williams, D. A.</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lopes%2C+R%2E+M%2E+C%2E%22">Lopes, R. M. C.</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Geophysical+Research%2E+Planets%22">Journal of Geophysical Research. Planets</searchLink>. Jan2025, Vol. 130 Issue 1, p1-16. 16p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Kuiper+belt%22">Kuiper belt</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Geological+maps%22">Geological maps</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Geological+mapping%22">Geological mapping</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sequence+stratigraphy%22">Sequence stratigraphy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Solar+system%22">Solar system</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Impact+craters%22">Impact craters</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lunar+craters%22">Lunar craters</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Pluto's surface displays a wide variety of geologic units from smooth plains to extremely rugged mountainous expanses. These terrains range in age from young, actively resurfaced regions (no observable craters even in the highest‐resolution New Horizons images) to old, heavily cratered, eroded regions. Here we expand upon the crater data analysis and the independent crater data set used in the production of a 1:7M scale geologic map of Pluto that is to be published by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS). We present both relative ages based on crater spatial density (number of craters in a given size bin per km2) and quantitative ages (e.g., 2 Ga) using the estimated impactor flux onto Pluto. The techniques presented here were developed specifically for the information available from a USGS geologic map, where smaller craters are mapped as points only (no specific diameter information per crater). We developed a new type of visualization, called a distributed R‐plot, to understand the relative ages of the geologic units. The uncertainties in the current knowledge of the Kuiper belt populations and impactor flux at Pluto propagate to large uncertainties in the estimated quantitative ages (∼a factor of two). However, both relative and quantitative ages from crater analysis are valuable tools in developing the sequence of geologic events. Pluto has large areas of crater‐free young terrains (13 units making up ∼27% of mapped higher‐resolution surface area) with widely varying morphologies, indicating a variety of resurfacing mechanisms, both exogenic and endogenic, likely active in Pluto's recent past or present. Plain Language Summary: Geologic maps highlight different types of units across a body and can be useful for observing patterns and understanding the geologic history of a body. Craters form continuously across Pluto from the bombardment of other smaller Kuiper belt objects. Thus, a surface with fewer craters has likely been resurfaced. The resurfacing event could partially or completely erase craters, could happen at a more distinct point in time, or be a long‐term process. Each of these scenarios leaves different geological clues, both in the number of craters and their erosion states. A large fraction (∼30%) of the surface of Pluto observed in detail by the New Horizons spacecraft (Plutos "near‐side") is completely devoid of craters, indicating that these are very young surfaces and implying relatively recent geologic activity on Pluto. Additionally, the impact rates on Pluto have been estimated and we can get a rough idea of when in the Solar System's ∼4.5 billion year history the surfaces on Pluto likely formed. Key Points: We developed crater analysis techniques with specific applications for determining stratigraphic sequences on United States Geologic Survey geologic mapsPluto has a wide variety of both younger and older terrain types, implying ongoing activity and a diverse geologic historyYoung, crater‐free, areas with widely varying geomorphology make up a large fraction, about 30%, of Pluto's near‐side [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Geophysical Research. Planets is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=184015531
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1029/2024JE008533
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Kuiper belt
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Geological maps
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Geological mapping
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sequence stratigraphy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Solar system
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Impact craters
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Lunar craters
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Pluto Geologic Map: Use of Crater Data to Understand Age Relationships.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Singer, K. N.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: White, O. L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Greenstreet, S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Moore, J. M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Williams, D. A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lopes, R. M. C.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 21699097
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 130
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Geophysical Research. Planets
              Type: main
ResultId 1