Potential Interference Bias in Ozone Standard Compliance Monitoring.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Potential Interference Bias in Ozone Standard Compliance Monitoring.
Authors: Leston, Alan R.1 aleston@hotmail.com, Ollison, Will M.2, Spicer, Chester W.3, Satola, Jan3
Source: Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (Air & Waste Management Association). Oct2005, Vol. 55 Issue 10, p1464-1472. 9p. 1 Chart, 8 Graphs.
Subject Terms: *Ozone, *Air pollution monitoring, *Air quality
Geographic Terms: United States
Company/Entity: United States. Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established a federal reference method (FRM) for ozone (O3) and allowed for designation of federal equivalent methods (FEMs). However, the ethylene-chemiluminescence FRM for O3 has been replaced by the UV photometric FEM by most state and local monitoring agencies because of its relative ease of operation. Accumulating evidence indicates that the FEM is prone to bias under the hot, humid, and stagnant conditions conducive to high O3 formation. This bias may lead to overreporting hourly O3 concentrations by as much as 20-40 ppb. Measurement bias is caused by contamination of the O3 scrubber, a problem that is not detected by dry air calibration. An adequate wet test has not been codified, although a procedure has been proposed for agency consideration. This paper includes documentation of laboratory tests quantifying specific interferant responses, collocated ambient FRM/FEM monitoring results, and smog chamber comparisons of the FRM and FEMs with alternative scrubber designs. As the numbers of reports on monitor interferences have grown, interested parties have called for agency recognition and correction of these biases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (Air & Waste Management Association) is the property of Air & Waste Management Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 18538487
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Potential Interference Bias in Ozone Standard Compliance Monitoring.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leston%2C+Alan+R%2E%22">Leston, Alan R.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> aleston@hotmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ollison%2C+Will+M%2E%22">Ollison, Will M.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spicer%2C+Chester+W%2E%22">Spicer, Chester W.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Satola%2C+Jan%22">Satola, Jan</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+the+Air+%26+Waste+Management+Association+%28Air+%26+Waste+Management+Association%29%22">Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (Air & Waste Management Association)</searchLink>. Oct2005, Vol. 55 Issue 10, p1464-1472. 9p. 1 Chart, 8 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ozone%22">Ozone</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Air+pollution+monitoring%22">Air pollution monitoring</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Air+quality%22">Air quality</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectCompany
  Label: Company/Entity
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%2E+Environmental+Protection+Agency%22">United States. Environmental Protection Agency</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established a federal reference method (FRM) for ozone (O3) and allowed for designation of federal equivalent methods (FEMs). However, the ethylene-chemiluminescence FRM for O3 has been replaced by the UV photometric FEM by most state and local monitoring agencies because of its relative ease of operation. Accumulating evidence indicates that the FEM is prone to bias under the hot, humid, and stagnant conditions conducive to high O3 formation. This bias may lead to overreporting hourly O3 concentrations by as much as 20-40 ppb. Measurement bias is caused by contamination of the O3 scrubber, a problem that is not detected by dry air calibration. An adequate wet test has not been codified, although a procedure has been proposed for agency consideration. This paper includes documentation of laboratory tests quantifying specific interferant responses, collocated ambient FRM/FEM monitoring results, and smog chamber comparisons of the FRM and FEMs with alternative scrubber designs. As the numbers of reports on monitor interferences have grown, interested parties have called for agency recognition and correction of these biases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (Air & Waste Management Association) is the property of Air & Waste Management Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=18538487
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464749
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 1464
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Ozone
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Air pollution monitoring
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Air quality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States. Environmental Protection Agency
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Potential Interference Bias in Ozone Standard Compliance Monitoring.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Leston, Alan R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ollison, Will M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Spicer, Chester W.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Satola, Jan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2005
              Type: published
              Y: 2005
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10962247
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 55
            – Type: issue
              Value: 10
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (Air & Waste Management Association)
              Type: main
ResultId 1