View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Current practice, challenges and future opportunities in the safety assessment of newly expressed proteins in genetically modified plants.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Current practice, challenges and future opportunities in the safety assessment of newly expressed proteins in genetically modified plants.
Authors: Casacuberta, Josep (AUTHOR), Barro, Francisco (AUTHOR), Braeuning, Albert (AUTHOR), de Maagd, Ruud (AUTHOR), Epstein, Michelle M. (AUTHOR), Frenzel, Thomas (AUTHOR), Gallois, Jean‐Luc (AUTHOR), Koning, Frits (AUTHOR), Messéan, Antoine (AUTHOR), Moreno, F. Javier (AUTHOR), Nogué, Fabien (AUTHOR), Savoini, Giovanni (AUTHOR), Schulman, Alan H. (AUTHOR), Tebbe, Christoph (AUTHOR), Veromann, Eve (AUTHOR), Ardizzone, Michele (AUTHOR), Belmonte, Luca (AUTHOR), Bonatti, Martina (AUTHOR), Dewhurst, Ian (AUTHOR), Dimitrov, Ivan (AUTHOR)
Source: EFSA Journal. Aug2025, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p1-40. 40p.
Subject Terms: *Transgenic organisms, *Food safety, *Transgenic plants, Safety, Risk assessment, Protein expression, Food safety laws, Systems theory
Abstract: Current risk assessment strategies for protein safety of newly expressed proteins (NEPs) in genetically modified (GM) plants are based on chemical risk assessment principles and Codex Alimentarius guidelines for biotech‐derived foods, initially published in 2003. These guidelines were designed for proteins with multiple testing options and for GMOs expressing a low number of NEPs. However, two decades of experience in assessing GMO and biotech products, along with recent advances in the field, underscore the need to update best practices for protein safety assessment. Furthermore, new types of products challenge the application of the current international guidelines, as assessments become more complex due to NEPs that are difficult to test using existing approaches or products with numerous NEPs. This document outlines a strategy that strengthens the stepwise, weight‐of‐evidence approach, incorporating new methodologies as complementary or alternative studies. An improved strategy for protein safety assessment could include: (1) considering history of safe use (HoSU), read‐across and phylogeny defining the type of data required and remove the need for specific in vitro or in vivo studies; (2) applying advanced in silico tools, including predictive computational models and improved phylogenetic analysis to enable more accurate comparisons with known allergens, toxins or 'safe' proteins; (3) using standardised in vitro gastrointestinal models that replicate physiological conditions; (4) developing targeted in vivo studies; (5) evaluating the role of exposure in the safety assessment; and, where necessary, (6) considering post‐market monitoring for risk characterisation. Consensus on the definition of HoSU and the effective integration of novel methodologies into the current NEP safety assessment will be essential to meet society's demand for safer, healthier and more sustainable food/feed in a growing world. This calls for revisiting and refining the goals of protein safety risk assessment to ensure that NEPs in biotech products are evaluated appropriately, consistently and proportionately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of EFSA Journal is the property of European Food Safety Authority and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 187635878
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Current practice, challenges and future opportunities in the safety assessment of newly expressed proteins in genetically modified plants.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Casacuberta%2C+Josep%22">Casacuberta, Josep</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Barro%2C+Francisco%22">Barro, Francisco</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Braeuning%2C+Albert%22">Braeuning, Albert</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22de+Maagd%2C+Ruud%22">de Maagd, Ruud</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Epstein%2C+Michelle+M%2E%22">Epstein, Michelle M.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Frenzel%2C+Thomas%22">Frenzel, Thomas</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gallois%2C+Jean‐Luc%22">Gallois, Jean‐Luc</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Koning%2C+Frits%22">Koning, Frits</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Messéan%2C+Antoine%22">Messéan, Antoine</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moreno%2C+F%2E+Javier%22">Moreno, F. Javier</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nogué%2C+Fabien%22">Nogué, Fabien</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Savoini%2C+Giovanni%22">Savoini, Giovanni</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schulman%2C+Alan+H%2E%22">Schulman, Alan H.</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tebbe%2C+Christoph%22">Tebbe, Christoph</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Veromann%2C+Eve%22">Veromann, Eve</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ardizzone%2C+Michele%22">Ardizzone, Michele</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Belmonte%2C+Luca%22">Belmonte, Luca</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bonatti%2C+Martina%22">Bonatti, Martina</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dewhurst%2C+Ian%22">Dewhurst, Ian</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dimitrov%2C+Ivan%22">Dimitrov, Ivan</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22EFSA+Journal%22">EFSA Journal</searchLink>. Aug2025, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p1-40. 40p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transgenic+organisms%22">Transgenic organisms</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Food+safety%22">Food safety</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transgenic+plants%22">Transgenic plants</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Safety%22">Safety</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk+assessment%22">Risk assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Protein+expression%22">Protein expression</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Food+safety+laws%22">Food safety laws</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systems+theory%22">Systems theory</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Current risk assessment strategies for protein safety of newly expressed proteins (NEPs) in genetically modified (GM) plants are based on chemical risk assessment principles and Codex Alimentarius guidelines for biotech‐derived foods, initially published in 2003. These guidelines were designed for proteins with multiple testing options and for GMOs expressing a low number of NEPs. However, two decades of experience in assessing GMO and biotech products, along with recent advances in the field, underscore the need to update best practices for protein safety assessment. Furthermore, new types of products challenge the application of the current international guidelines, as assessments become more complex due to NEPs that are difficult to test using existing approaches or products with numerous NEPs. This document outlines a strategy that strengthens the stepwise, weight‐of‐evidence approach, incorporating new methodologies as complementary or alternative studies. An improved strategy for protein safety assessment could include: (1) considering history of safe use (HoSU), read‐across and phylogeny defining the type of data required and remove the need for specific in vitro or in vivo studies; (2) applying advanced in silico tools, including predictive computational models and improved phylogenetic analysis to enable more accurate comparisons with known allergens, toxins or 'safe' proteins; (3) using standardised in vitro gastrointestinal models that replicate physiological conditions; (4) developing targeted in vivo studies; (5) evaluating the role of exposure in the safety assessment; and, where necessary, (6) considering post‐market monitoring for risk characterisation. Consensus on the definition of HoSU and the effective integration of novel methodologies into the current NEP safety assessment will be essential to meet society's demand for safer, healthier and more sustainable food/feed in a growing world. This calls for revisiting and refining the goals of protein safety risk assessment to ensure that NEPs in biotech products are evaluated appropriately, consistently and proportionately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of EFSA Journal is the property of European Food Safety Authority and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=187635878
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9568
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 40
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Transgenic organisms
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Food safety
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Transgenic plants
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Safety
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Risk assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Protein expression
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Food safety laws
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systems theory
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Current practice, challenges and future opportunities in the safety assessment of newly expressed proteins in genetically modified plants.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Casacuberta, Josep
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Barro, Francisco
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Braeuning, Albert
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: de Maagd, Ruud
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Epstein, Michelle M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Frenzel, Thomas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gallois, Jean‐Luc
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Koning, Frits
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Messéan, Antoine
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Moreno, F. Javier
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nogué, Fabien
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Savoini, Giovanni
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schulman, Alan H.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tebbe, Christoph
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Veromann, Eve
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ardizzone, Michele
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Belmonte, Luca
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bonatti, Martina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dewhurst, Ian
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dimitrov, Ivan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 18314732
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 23
            – Type: issue
              Value: 8
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: EFSA Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1