View in EDS

Clarifying the trophic state concept to advance macroscale freshwater science and management.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Clarifying the trophic state concept to advance macroscale freshwater science and management.
Authors: Meyer, Michael F.1,2 (AUTHOR) mfmeyer@usgs.gov, Kraemer, Benjamin M.3 (AUTHOR), Barbosa, Carolina C.4 (AUTHOR), Cunha, Davi G. F.5 (AUTHOR), Dodds, Walter K.6 (AUTHOR), Hampton, Stephanie E.7 (AUTHOR), Ordóñez, César8 (AUTHOR), Pilla, Rachel M.9 (AUTHOR), Pollard, Amina I.10 (AUTHOR), Culpepper, Joshua A.11 (AUTHOR), Fremier, Alexander K.12 (AUTHOR), King, Tyler V.13 (AUTHOR), Ladwig, Robert2,14 (AUTHOR), Leech, Dina M.15 (AUTHOR), Matsuzaki, Shin‐Ichiro S.16 (AUTHOR), Oleksy, Isabella A.17 (AUTHOR), Topp, Simon N.18 (AUTHOR), Woolway, R. Iestyn19 (AUTHOR), Brighenti, Ludmila S.20 (AUTHOR), Fickas, Kate C.21,22 (AUTHOR)
Source: Ecosphere. Sep2025, Vol. 16 Issue 9, p1-20. 20p.
Subject Terms: *Trophic state index, *Eutrophication, *Ecosystem management, *Fresh water, *Biological productivity, Classification
Abstract: For over a century, ecologists have used the concept of trophic state (TS) to characterize an aquatic ecosystem's biological productivity. However, multiple TS classification schemes, each relying on a variety of measurable parameters as proxies for productivity, have emerged to meet use‐specific needs. Frequently, chlorophyll a, phosphorus, and Secchi depth are used to classify TS based on autotrophic production, whereas phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon, and true color are used to classify TS based on both autotrophic and heterotrophic production. Both classification approaches aim to characterize an ecosystem's function broadly, but with varying degrees of autotrophic and heterotrophic processes considered in those characterizations. Moreover, differing classification schemes can create inconsistent interpretations of ecosystem integrity. For example, the US Clean Water Act focuses exclusively on algal threats to water quality, framed in terms of eutrophication in response to nutrient loading. This usage lacks information about non‐algal threats to water quality, such as dystrophication in response to dissolved organic carbon loading. Consequently, the TS classification schemes used to identify eutrophication and dystrophication may refer to ecosystems similarly (e.g., oligotrophic and eutrophic), yet these categories are derived from different proxies. These inconsistencies in TS classification schemes may be compounded when interdisciplinary projects employ varied TS frameworks. Even with these shortcomings, TS can still be used to distill information on complex aquatic ecosystem function into a set of generalizable expectations. The usefulness of distilling complex information into a TS index is substantial such that usage inconsistencies should be explicitly addressed and resolved. To emphasize the consequences of diverging TS classification schemes, we present three case studies for which an improved understanding of the TS concept advances freshwater research, management efforts, and interdisciplinary collaboration. To increase clarity in TS, the aquatic sciences could benefit from including information about the proxy variables, ecosystem type, as well as the spatiotemporal domains used to classify TS. As the field of aquatic sciences expands and climatic irregularity increases, we highlight the importance of re‐evaluating fundamental concepts, such as TS, to ensure their compatibility with evolving science. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ecosphere is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 188311564
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Clarifying the trophic state concept to advance macroscale freshwater science and management.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meyer%2C+Michael+F%2E%22">Meyer, Michael F.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> mfmeyer@usgs.gov</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kraemer%2C+Benjamin+M%2E%22">Kraemer, Benjamin M.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Barbosa%2C+Carolina+C%2E%22">Barbosa, Carolina C.</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cunha%2C+Davi+G%2E+F%2E%22">Cunha, Davi G. F.</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dodds%2C+Walter+K%2E%22">Dodds, Walter K.</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hampton%2C+Stephanie+E%2E%22">Hampton, Stephanie E.</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ordóñez%2C+César%22">Ordóñez, César</searchLink><relatesTo>8</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pilla%2C+Rachel+M%2E%22">Pilla, Rachel M.</searchLink><relatesTo>9</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pollard%2C+Amina+I%2E%22">Pollard, Amina I.</searchLink><relatesTo>10</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Culpepper%2C+Joshua+A%2E%22">Culpepper, Joshua A.</searchLink><relatesTo>11</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fremier%2C+Alexander+K%2E%22">Fremier, Alexander K.</searchLink><relatesTo>12</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22King%2C+Tyler+V%2E%22">King, Tyler V.</searchLink><relatesTo>13</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ladwig%2C+Robert%22">Ladwig, Robert</searchLink><relatesTo>2,14</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leech%2C+Dina+M%2E%22">Leech, Dina M.</searchLink><relatesTo>15</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Matsuzaki%2C+Shin‐Ichiro+S%2E%22">Matsuzaki, Shin‐Ichiro S.</searchLink><relatesTo>16</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Oleksy%2C+Isabella+A%2E%22">Oleksy, Isabella A.</searchLink><relatesTo>17</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Topp%2C+Simon+N%2E%22">Topp, Simon N.</searchLink><relatesTo>18</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Woolway%2C+R%2E+Iestyn%22">Woolway, R. Iestyn</searchLink><relatesTo>19</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brighenti%2C+Ludmila+S%2E%22">Brighenti, Ludmila S.</searchLink><relatesTo>20</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fickas%2C+Kate+C%2E%22">Fickas, Kate C.</searchLink><relatesTo>21,22</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ecosphere%22">Ecosphere</searchLink>. Sep2025, Vol. 16 Issue 9, p1-20. 20p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trophic+state+index%22">Trophic state index</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Eutrophication%22">Eutrophication</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ecosystem+management%22">Ecosystem management</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fresh+water%22">Fresh water</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biological+productivity%22">Biological productivity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification%22">Classification</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: For over a century, ecologists have used the concept of trophic state (TS) to characterize an aquatic ecosystem's biological productivity. However, multiple TS classification schemes, each relying on a variety of measurable parameters as proxies for productivity, have emerged to meet use‐specific needs. Frequently, chlorophyll a, phosphorus, and Secchi depth are used to classify TS based on autotrophic production, whereas phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon, and true color are used to classify TS based on both autotrophic and heterotrophic production. Both classification approaches aim to characterize an ecosystem's function broadly, but with varying degrees of autotrophic and heterotrophic processes considered in those characterizations. Moreover, differing classification schemes can create inconsistent interpretations of ecosystem integrity. For example, the US Clean Water Act focuses exclusively on algal threats to water quality, framed in terms of eutrophication in response to nutrient loading. This usage lacks information about non‐algal threats to water quality, such as dystrophication in response to dissolved organic carbon loading. Consequently, the TS classification schemes used to identify eutrophication and dystrophication may refer to ecosystems similarly (e.g., oligotrophic and eutrophic), yet these categories are derived from different proxies. These inconsistencies in TS classification schemes may be compounded when interdisciplinary projects employ varied TS frameworks. Even with these shortcomings, TS can still be used to distill information on complex aquatic ecosystem function into a set of generalizable expectations. The usefulness of distilling complex information into a TS index is substantial such that usage inconsistencies should be explicitly addressed and resolved. To emphasize the consequences of diverging TS classification schemes, we present three case studies for which an improved understanding of the TS concept advances freshwater research, management efforts, and interdisciplinary collaboration. To increase clarity in TS, the aquatic sciences could benefit from including information about the proxy variables, ecosystem type, as well as the spatiotemporal domains used to classify TS. As the field of aquatic sciences expands and climatic irregularity increases, we highlight the importance of re‐evaluating fundamental concepts, such as TS, to ensure their compatibility with evolving science. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ecosphere is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=188311564
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/ecs2.70392
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Trophic state index
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Eutrophication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ecosystem management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Fresh water
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biological productivity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Classification
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Clarifying the trophic state concept to advance macroscale freshwater science and management.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Meyer, Michael F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kraemer, Benjamin M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Barbosa, Carolina C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cunha, Davi G. F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dodds, Walter K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hampton, Stephanie E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ordóñez, César
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pilla, Rachel M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pollard, Amina I.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Culpepper, Joshua A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fremier, Alexander K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: King, Tyler V.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ladwig, Robert
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Leech, Dina M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Matsuzaki, Shin‐Ichiro S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Oleksy, Isabella A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Topp, Simon N.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Woolway, R. Iestyn
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Brighenti, Ludmila S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fickas, Kate C.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 21508925
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 16
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ecosphere
              Type: main
ResultId 1