Global sensitivity analysis workflows and rankings: A practical comparison for researchers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Global sensitivity analysis workflows and rankings: A practical comparison for researchers.
Authors: Newman, Ken B.1,2 (AUTHOR) ken.newman@bioss.ac.uk, Naha, Shaini3 (AUTHOR), Jackson-Blake, Leah A.4 (AUTHOR), Topp, Cairistiona5 (AUTHOR), Glendell, Miriam3 (AUTHOR), Butler, Adam1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Environmental Modelling & Software. May2026, Vol. 200, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subject Terms: Sensitivity analysis, Computer simulation, Regression trees, Workflow management
Abstract: Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) is a recommended step in the use of computer simulation models. GSA quantifies the relative importance of model inputs on outputs (Factor Ranking), identifies inputs that could be fixed, thus simplifying model calibration (Factor Fixing), and pinpoints areas for future data collection (Factor Prioritization). Given the wide variety of GSA methods, choosing between methods can be challenging. We provide a practitioner-focused guide for non-GSA experts that compares both widely and less commonly used GSA methods, discuss implementation and interpretation issues, and propose a workflow. We assess the degree of similarity in Factor Ranking based on a study of three simulators of differing complexity. A critical issue for all methods is specification of parameter ranges. Factor Rankings were generally quite similar based on Kendall's W. Sobol' first order and total sensitivity indices were easy to interpret and informative with regression trees providing additional insight into interactions. • Provides a practitioner-focused framework for conducting Global Sensitivity Analysis. • Clarifies implementation choices, interpretation, and limitations. • Presents a ten-step workflow for non-specialists. • Applies several GSA methods to three real world simulators of varying complexity. • Factor rankings across methods were highly similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Environmental Modelling & Software is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
Description
Abstract:Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) is a recommended step in the use of computer simulation models. GSA quantifies the relative importance of model inputs on outputs (Factor Ranking), identifies inputs that could be fixed, thus simplifying model calibration (Factor Fixing), and pinpoints areas for future data collection (Factor Prioritization). Given the wide variety of GSA methods, choosing between methods can be challenging. We provide a practitioner-focused guide for non-GSA experts that compares both widely and less commonly used GSA methods, discuss implementation and interpretation issues, and propose a workflow. We assess the degree of similarity in Factor Ranking based on a study of three simulators of differing complexity. A critical issue for all methods is specification of parameter ranges. Factor Rankings were generally quite similar based on Kendall's W. Sobol' first order and total sensitivity indices were easy to interpret and informative with regression trees providing additional insight into interactions. • Provides a practitioner-focused framework for conducting Global Sensitivity Analysis. • Clarifies implementation choices, interpretation, and limitations. • Presents a ten-step workflow for non-specialists. • Applies several GSA methods to three real world simulators of varying complexity. • Factor rankings across methods were highly similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:13648152
DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2026.106956