Are Toxic Butterflies More Easily Detected by Human 'Predators'?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Are Toxic Butterflies More Easily Detected by Human 'Predators'?
Authors: Erickson, Marilia Fernandes1 (AUTHOR) marilia.fernandeserickson@students.mq.edu.au, McLean, Donald James1 (AUTHOR), Herberstein, Marie E.1,2,3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Ecology & Evolution (20457758). Apr2026, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p1-12. 12p.
Subject Terms: *Toxicity testing, *Animal behavior, Butterflies, Insect wings, Animal coloration, Lepidoptera, Aposematism, Predation
Abstract: Butterfly colours often signal unprofitability due to toxicity to predators, with more conspicuous colour signals increasing predator avoidance learning. These signals can be on the dorsal and/or ventral wing surfaces, which are more visible during flight or at rest respectively. Here we are interested in the relationship between toxicity and conspicuousness in Australian butterflies. We use detectability as a proxy for conspicuousness and test whether toxic butterflies are more detectable on both the dorsal and ventral wing sides using a computer game where humans hunt butterflies against multiple backgrounds. The game was played by over 1700 players who collectively reacted to over 67,000 images of butterflies. Toxicity was assessed using Daphnia mortality assays on over 420 individuals from 61 species. Specifically, we tested (1) if the detectability of dorsal or ventral butterfly wings was related to toxicity, and (2) if butterflies that were more toxic had similar dorsal and ventral detectability. For dorsal surfaces, we found that the more toxic butterflies were detected faster than less toxic butterflies, whereas there was no relationship between toxicity and detection time for ventral surfaces. These findings are consistent with previous work that suggests aposematic signals are particularly relevant when animals are in motion, since the dorsal wing surface of butterflies—the more detectable side—is usually visible during flight rather than at rest. We also found that more toxic butterflies were more similar between dorsal and ventral detection, suggesting that greater levels of toxicity are communicated both ventrally and dorsally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ecology & Evolution (20457758) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: GreenFILE
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: 8gh
DbLabel: GreenFILE
An: 193322581
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Are Toxic Butterflies More Easily Detected by Human 'Predators'?
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Erickson%2C+Marilia+Fernandes%22">Erickson, Marilia Fernandes</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> marilia.fernandeserickson@students.mq.edu.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McLean%2C+Donald+James%22">McLean, Donald James</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Herberstein%2C+Marie+E%2E%22">Herberstein, Marie E.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ecology+%26+Evolution+%2820457758%29%22">Ecology & Evolution (20457758)</searchLink>. Apr2026, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p1-12. 12p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Toxicity+testing%22">Toxicity testing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Animal+behavior%22">Animal behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Butterflies%22">Butterflies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Insect+wings%22">Insect wings</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Animal+coloration%22">Animal coloration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lepidoptera%22">Lepidoptera</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Aposematism%22">Aposematism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predation%22">Predation</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Butterfly colours often signal unprofitability due to toxicity to predators, with more conspicuous colour signals increasing predator avoidance learning. These signals can be on the dorsal and/or ventral wing surfaces, which are more visible during flight or at rest respectively. Here we are interested in the relationship between toxicity and conspicuousness in Australian butterflies. We use detectability as a proxy for conspicuousness and test whether toxic butterflies are more detectable on both the dorsal and ventral wing sides using a computer game where humans hunt butterflies against multiple backgrounds. The game was played by over 1700 players who collectively reacted to over 67,000 images of butterflies. Toxicity was assessed using Daphnia mortality assays on over 420 individuals from 61 species. Specifically, we tested (1) if the detectability of dorsal or ventral butterfly wings was related to toxicity, and (2) if butterflies that were more toxic had similar dorsal and ventral detectability. For dorsal surfaces, we found that the more toxic butterflies were detected faster than less toxic butterflies, whereas there was no relationship between toxicity and detection time for ventral surfaces. These findings are consistent with previous work that suggests aposematic signals are particularly relevant when animals are in motion, since the dorsal wing surface of butterflies—the more detectable side—is usually visible during flight rather than at rest. We also found that more toxic butterflies were more similar between dorsal and ventral detection, suggesting that greater levels of toxicity are communicated both ventrally and dorsally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ecology & Evolution (20457758) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=193322581
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/ece3.73357
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Toxicity testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Animal behavior
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Butterflies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Insect wings
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Animal coloration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Lepidoptera
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Aposematism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Predation
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Are Toxic Butterflies More Easily Detected by Human 'Predators'?
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Erickson, Marilia Fernandes
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: McLean, Donald James
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Herberstein, Marie E.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 15
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 20457758
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 16
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ecology & Evolution (20457758)
              Type: main
ResultId 1