Vegetated Canopy Heterogeneity Footprints in the Roughness Sublayer.
Saved in:
| Title: | Vegetated Canopy Heterogeneity Footprints in the Roughness Sublayer. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Salmaso, Giulia1 (AUTHOR) giulia.r.salmaso@gmail.com, Cal, Raúl B.2 (AUTHOR), Calaf, Marc1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres. May2026, Vol. 131 Issue 10, p1-25. 25p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Plant canopies, Turbulent flow, Vegetation patterns, Large eddy simulation models, Surface roughness, Atmospheric boundary layer, Multiscale modeling |
| Abstract: | Turbulent flows over horizontally homogeneous rough surfaces are categorized as rough‐wall boundary layer flows, while flows over homogeneous vegetated canopies are better described through a mixing‐layer analogy. At present, numerous studies have investigated canopy density as a transition mechanism between rough‐wall and mixing‐layer‐type flows. Yet, most considered canopies have been spatially homogeneous, with few exceptions investigating agricultural arrangements. However, most vegetated canopies are not homogeneously distributed, but instead contain gaps and spatial heterogeneities of different scales. In these cases, it remains unclear which are the dominant flow traits, and how spatial heterogeneity affects them. To help overcome these knowledge gaps, this paper aims to characterize flows over vegetated canopies with scales of spatial heterogeneity ∼O102 ${\sim} \mathcal{O}\left(1{0}^{2}\right)$ m randomly distributed, with a uniform under‐canopy roughness and neutral stratification. Large Eddy Simulations of the atmospheric boundary layer with a geostrophic forcing are used. Canopy morphology and heterogeneity are quantified using the non‐dimensional lacunarity metric. Lacunarity is further leveraged to investigate non‐dimensional relations between canopy morphology and traditional turbulence statistics. Furthermore, canopy heterogeneity is investigated as a mechanism to transition from a mixing‐layer‐type flow to a rough‐wall boundary layer flow. Results suggest revised formulations for the Ls(λ) ${L}_{s}(\lambda)$ and ΛLs ${\Lambda }\left({L}_{s}\right)$ scaling relations to account for the effects of canopy heterogeneity. Results also reveal a novel scaling between the equivalent surface roughness z0 ${z}_{0}$ and the canopy heterogeneity parameter Hc ${\mathcal{H}}_{c}$, providing a starting point to better understand the role of canopy heterogeneity in atmospheric boundary layer flows. Plain Language Summary: Flows over rough surfaces are called rough‐wall boundary layer flows. Meanwhile, flows over vegetated canopies are described with a mixing‐layer analogy because the faster wind flow above the canopy is mixed with the slower flow caused by the presence of plants. Many studies have examined how vegetation density can change the flow, but most of them assume the vegetation as homogeneous. However, real vegetated canopies are uneven and show gaps. What is not clear yet is how the wind flow reacts to these heterogeneous vegetated surfaces: is the flow of a rough‐wall type, of a mixing‐layer type, or of an intermediate type? How does heterogeneity affect the type of flow? This paper aims to understand how these unevenly distributed vegetated areas, with gaps that range from 400 to 1,200 m, alter the flow. Numerical simulations are used to model the wind flow over different types of irregular vegetation cover. To measure the vegetation's heterogeneity, the authors use a non‐dimensional index called lacunarity. Lacunarity is also used to study relations between surface irregularities and traditional turbulence statistics. Results provide a starting point for better understanding the role of vegetation's heterogeneity on atmospheric boundary layer flows. Key Points: The link between heterogeneous vegetated canopies and atmospheric flow is investigated using Large Eddy SimulationsTurbulence statistics, and canopy flow length scales are derived for flows over heterogeneous canopiesRevised scaling relations for traditional turbulence statistics as function of canopy heterogeneity are derived [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | GreenFILE |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: 8gh DbLabel: GreenFILE An: 194136124 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Vegetated Canopy Heterogeneity Footprints in the Roughness Sublayer. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Salmaso%2C+Giulia%22">Salmaso, Giulia</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> giulia.r.salmaso@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cal%2C+Raúl+B%2E%22">Cal, Raúl B.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Calaf%2C+Marc%22">Calaf, Marc</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Geophysical+Research%2E+Atmospheres%22">Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres</searchLink>. May2026, Vol. 131 Issue 10, p1-25. 25p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Plant+canopies%22">Plant canopies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Turbulent+flow%22">Turbulent flow</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vegetation+patterns%22">Vegetation patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Large+eddy+simulation+models%22">Large eddy simulation models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surface+roughness%22">Surface roughness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Atmospheric+boundary+layer%22">Atmospheric boundary layer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiscale+modeling%22">Multiscale modeling</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Turbulent flows over horizontally homogeneous rough surfaces are categorized as rough‐wall boundary layer flows, while flows over homogeneous vegetated canopies are better described through a mixing‐layer analogy. At present, numerous studies have investigated canopy density as a transition mechanism between rough‐wall and mixing‐layer‐type flows. Yet, most considered canopies have been spatially homogeneous, with few exceptions investigating agricultural arrangements. However, most vegetated canopies are not homogeneously distributed, but instead contain gaps and spatial heterogeneities of different scales. In these cases, it remains unclear which are the dominant flow traits, and how spatial heterogeneity affects them. To help overcome these knowledge gaps, this paper aims to characterize flows over vegetated canopies with scales of spatial heterogeneity ∼O102 ${\sim} \mathcal{O}\left(1{0}^{2}\right)$ m randomly distributed, with a uniform under‐canopy roughness and neutral stratification. Large Eddy Simulations of the atmospheric boundary layer with a geostrophic forcing are used. Canopy morphology and heterogeneity are quantified using the non‐dimensional lacunarity metric. Lacunarity is further leveraged to investigate non‐dimensional relations between canopy morphology and traditional turbulence statistics. Furthermore, canopy heterogeneity is investigated as a mechanism to transition from a mixing‐layer‐type flow to a rough‐wall boundary layer flow. Results suggest revised formulations for the Ls(λ) ${L}_{s}(\lambda)$ and ΛLs ${\Lambda }\left({L}_{s}\right)$ scaling relations to account for the effects of canopy heterogeneity. Results also reveal a novel scaling between the equivalent surface roughness z0 ${z}_{0}$ and the canopy heterogeneity parameter Hc ${\mathcal{H}}_{c}$, providing a starting point to better understand the role of canopy heterogeneity in atmospheric boundary layer flows. Plain Language Summary: Flows over rough surfaces are called rough‐wall boundary layer flows. Meanwhile, flows over vegetated canopies are described with a mixing‐layer analogy because the faster wind flow above the canopy is mixed with the slower flow caused by the presence of plants. Many studies have examined how vegetation density can change the flow, but most of them assume the vegetation as homogeneous. However, real vegetated canopies are uneven and show gaps. What is not clear yet is how the wind flow reacts to these heterogeneous vegetated surfaces: is the flow of a rough‐wall type, of a mixing‐layer type, or of an intermediate type? How does heterogeneity affect the type of flow? This paper aims to understand how these unevenly distributed vegetated areas, with gaps that range from 400 to 1,200 m, alter the flow. Numerical simulations are used to model the wind flow over different types of irregular vegetation cover. To measure the vegetation's heterogeneity, the authors use a non‐dimensional index called lacunarity. Lacunarity is also used to study relations between surface irregularities and traditional turbulence statistics. Results provide a starting point for better understanding the role of vegetation's heterogeneity on atmospheric boundary layer flows. Key Points: The link between heterogeneous vegetated canopies and atmospheric flow is investigated using Large Eddy SimulationsTurbulence statistics, and canopy flow length scales are derived for flows over heterogeneous canopiesRevised scaling relations for traditional turbulence statistics as function of canopy heterogeneity are derived [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=194136124 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1029/2025JD043959 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 25 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Plant canopies Type: general – SubjectFull: Turbulent flow Type: general – SubjectFull: Vegetation patterns Type: general – SubjectFull: Large eddy simulation models Type: general – SubjectFull: Surface roughness Type: general – SubjectFull: Atmospheric boundary layer Type: general – SubjectFull: Multiscale modeling Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Vegetated Canopy Heterogeneity Footprints in the Roughness Sublayer. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Salmaso, Giulia – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cal, Raúl B. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Calaf, Marc IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 28 M: 05 Text: May2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2169897X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 131 – Type: issue Value: 10 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |