Target acquisition performance comparison of active continuous-wave and range-gated imaging systems at 1.6 and 2.1 μm.
Saved in:
| Title: | Target acquisition performance comparison of active continuous-wave and range-gated imaging systems at 1.6 and 2.1 μm. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Follansbee, Joshua1, jfollansbee@arizona.edu, Burrell, Derek1, derekburrell@arizona.edu, Furxhi, Orges1, orgesfurxhi@gmail.com, Renshaw, C. Kyle2, krenshaw@creol.ucf.edu, Lund, John3, john.a.lund.ctr@army.mil, Driggers, Ronald1, rdriggers@optics.arizona.edu |
| Source: | Optical Engineering; Sep2023, Vol. 62 Issue 9, p94107-94107, 1p |
| Database: | Applied Science & Technology Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: aci DbLabel: Applied Science & Technology Source An: 172431425 AccessLevel: 2 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Target acquisition performance comparison of active continuous-wave and range-gated imaging systems at 1.6 and 2.1 μm. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Follansbee%2C+Joshua%22">Follansbee, Joshua</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>, <i>jfollansbee@arizona.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Burrell%2C+Derek%22">Burrell, Derek</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>, <i>derekburrell@arizona.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Furxhi%2C+Orges%22">Furxhi, Orges</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>, <i>orgesfurxhi@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Renshaw%2C+C%2E+Kyle%22">Renshaw, C. Kyle</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>, <i>krenshaw@creol.ucf.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Lund%2C+John%22">Lund, John</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>, <i>john.a.lund.ctr@army.mil</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AU" term="%22Driggers%2C+Ronald%22">Driggers, Ronald</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>, <i>rdriggers@optics.arizona.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Optical+Engineering%22">Optical Engineering</searchLink>; Sep2023, Vol. 62 Issue 9, p94107-94107, 1p |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=aci&AN=172431425 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1117/1.OE.62.9.094107 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 1 StartPage: 94107 Titles: – TitleFull: Target acquisition performance comparison of active continuous-wave and range-gated imaging systems at 1.6 and 2.1 μm. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Follansbee, Joshua – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burrell, Derek – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Furxhi, Orges – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Renshaw, C. Kyle – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lund, John – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Driggers, Ronald IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Text: Sep2023 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00913286 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 62 – Type: issue Value: 9 Titles: – TitleFull: Optical Engineering Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |