APA (7th ed.) Citation

Gomes, E., Alder, G., Boardsworth, K., Anderson, K. L., Olsen, S., & Signal, N. (2025). Innovative but Difficult to Replicate: A Systematic Review of the Reporting Quality of Robotic and Conventional Upper-Limb Interventions in Stroke Rehabilitation Randomized Controlled Trials Using the TIDieR-Rehab Checklist. Applied Sciences (2076-3417), 15(15), 8487. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158487

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Gomes, Emeline, Gemma Alder, Kate Boardsworth, Kate L. Anderson, Sharon Olsen, and Nada Signal. "Innovative but Difficult to Replicate: A Systematic Review of the Reporting Quality of Robotic and Conventional Upper-Limb Interventions in Stroke Rehabilitation Randomized Controlled Trials Using the TIDieR-Rehab Checklist." Applied Sciences (2076-3417) 15, no. 15 (2025): 8487. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158487.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Gomes, Emeline, et al. "Innovative but Difficult to Replicate: A Systematic Review of the Reporting Quality of Robotic and Conventional Upper-Limb Interventions in Stroke Rehabilitation Randomized Controlled Trials Using the TIDieR-Rehab Checklist." Applied Sciences (2076-3417), vol. 15, no. 15, 2025, p. 8487, https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158487.