FL, D., L, T., & FG, S. (2010). Cervical external immobilization devices: Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging issues at 3.0 tesla. Spine (03622436), 35(4), 411. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0e9f8
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationFL, Diaz, Tweardy L, and Shellock FG. "Cervical External Immobilization Devices: Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Issues at 3.0 Tesla." Spine (03622436) 35, no. 4 (2010): 411. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0e9f8.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationFL, Diaz, et al. "Cervical External Immobilization Devices: Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Issues at 3.0 Tesla." Spine (03622436), vol. 35, no. 4, 2010, p. 411, https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0e9f8.
Warning: These citations may not always be 100% accurate.