A, P., BJ, G., ME, B., AM, L., JW, M., EM, O., . . . GW, S. (2009). Prognostic significance of periprocedural versus spontaneously occurring myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: An analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), 54(5), 477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.063
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationA, Prasad, et al. "Prognostic Significance of Periprocedural Versus Spontaneously Occurring Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial." Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) 54, no. 5 (2009): 477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.063.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationA, Prasad, et al. "Prognostic Significance of Periprocedural Versus Spontaneously Occurring Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial." Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), vol. 54, no. 5, 2009, p. 477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.063.
