APA (7th ed.) Citation

CS, S., SH, L., HD, S., HS, K., WC, C., B, J., . . . Lee, H. Y. (2007). CHARITE versus ProDisc: A comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up. Spine (03622436), 32(9), 1012. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000260795.57798.a0

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

CS, Shim, et al. "CHARITE Versus ProDisc: A Comparative Study of a Minimum 3-year Follow-up." Spine (03622436) 32, no. 9 (2007): 1012. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000260795.57798.a0.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

CS, Shim, et al. "CHARITE Versus ProDisc: A Comparative Study of a Minimum 3-year Follow-up." Spine (03622436), vol. 32, no. 9, 2007, p. 1012, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000260795.57798.a0.