Correction: How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals.
Saved in:
| Title: | Correction: How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | null, null |
| Source: | PLoS ONE. 9/29/2015, Vol. 10 Issue 9, p1-2. 2p. |
| Database: | Academic Search Ultimate |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: asn DbLabel: Academic Search Ultimate An: 110015444 AccessLevel: 2 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Correction: How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22null%2C+null%22">null, null</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22PLoS+ONE%22">PLoS ONE</searchLink>. 9/29/2015, Vol. 10 Issue 9, p1-2. 2p. |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asn&AN=110015444 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139783 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 2 StartPage: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Correction: How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: null, null IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 29 M: 09 Text: 9/29/2015 Type: published Y: 2015 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 19326203 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 10 – Type: issue Value: 9 Titles: – TitleFull: PLoS ONE Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
