APA (7th ed.) Citation

Yudi, M., Goh, C., Tsang, D., Ramchand, J., Gayed, D., Theuerle, J., . . . Farouque, O. (2016). Is the New Definition of “Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction” After Coronary Revascularisation Prognostically Significant? Heart, Lung & Circulation, 25, S180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.421

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Yudi, M., C. Goh, D. Tsang, J. Ramchand, D. Gayed, J. Theuerle, K. Kalten, D. Clark, and O. Farouque. "Is the New Definition of “Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction” After Coronary Revascularisation Prognostically Significant?" Heart, Lung & Circulation 25 (2016): S180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.421.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Yudi, M., et al. "Is the New Definition of “Clinically Relevant Myocardial Infarction” After Coronary Revascularisation Prognostically Significant?" Heart, Lung & Circulation, vol. 25, 2016, p. S180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.421.