APA (7th ed.) Citation

Ciccarelli, G., Barbato, E., Toth, G. G., Gahl, B., Xaplanteris, P., Fournier, S., . . . De Bruyne, B. (2018). Angiography Versus Hemodynamics to Predict the Natural History of Coronary Stenoses: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation 2 Substudy. Circulation, 137(14), 1475. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028782

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Ciccarelli, Giovanni, et al. "Angiography Versus Hemodynamics to Predict the Natural History of Coronary Stenoses: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation 2 Substudy." Circulation 137, no. 14 (2018): 1475. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028782.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Ciccarelli, Giovanni, et al. "Angiography Versus Hemodynamics to Predict the Natural History of Coronary Stenoses: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation 2 Substudy." Circulation, vol. 137, no. 14, 2018, p. 1475, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028782.