APA (7th ed.) Citation

Groenland, F. T., Neleman, T., Kakar, H., Scoccia, A., Ziedses des Plantes, A. C., Clephas, P. R., . . . Daemen, J. (2022). Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 40, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2022.06.066

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Groenland, Frederik T.W., et al. "Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 40 (2022): 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2022.06.066.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Groenland, Frederik T.W., et al. "Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, vol. 40, 2022, p. 32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2022.06.066.