APA (7th ed.) Citation

Rovera, G., Grimaldi, S., Dall'Armellina, S., Zotta, M., Finessi, M., Passera, R., & Deandreis, D. (2023). Comparison of Digital versus Analog 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Performance in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients with Early Biochemical Recurrence or Persistence after Radical Treatment. Diagnostics (2075-4418), 13(23), 3535. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13233535

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Rovera, Guido, Serena Grimaldi, Sara Dall'Armellina, Michela Zotta, Monica Finessi, Roberto Passera, and Désirée Deandreis. "Comparison of Digital Versus Analog 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Performance in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients with Early Biochemical Recurrence or Persistence After Radical Treatment." Diagnostics (2075-4418) 13, no. 23 (2023): 3535. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13233535.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Rovera, Guido, et al. "Comparison of Digital Versus Analog 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Performance in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients with Early Biochemical Recurrence or Persistence After Radical Treatment." Diagnostics (2075-4418), vol. 13, no. 23, 2023, p. 3535, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13233535.