An empirical comparison of statistical methods for multiple cut-off diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) depression screening tool using published results vs individual participant data.
Saved in:
| Title: | An empirical comparison of statistical methods for multiple cut-off diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) depression screening tool using published results vs individual participant data. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Negeri, Zelalem F.1 (AUTHOR), Levis, Brooke2,3 (AUTHOR), Ioannidis, John P. A.4 (AUTHOR), Thombs, Brett D.2,3,5,6,7,8 (AUTHOR), Benedetti, Andrea3,6,9,10 (AUTHOR) andrea.benedetti@mcgill.ca, the DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) EPDS Group (AUTHOR), Sun, Ying (AUTHOR), He, Chen (AUTHOR), Krishnan, Ankur (AUTHOR), Wu, Yin (AUTHOR), Bhandari, Parash Mani (AUTHOR), Neupane, Dipika (AUTHOR), Imran, Mahrukh (AUTHOR), Rice, Danielle B. (AUTHOR), Azar, Marleine (AUTHOR), Chiovitti, Matthew J. (AUTHOR), Riehm, Kira E. (AUTHOR), Boruff, Jill T. (AUTHOR), Cuijpers, Pim (AUTHOR), Gilbody, Simon (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2/1/2024, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p1-13. 13p. |
| Database: | Academic Search Ultimate |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
