APA (7th ed.) Citation

Degirmentepe, R. B., Akca, Y. M., Alp, S., Cimen, H. I., Gul, D., Erkoc, M., . . . Halis, F. (2026). Retrograde intrarenal surgery with flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 2–3 cm kidney stones: Is less invasive better? Canadian Urological Association Journal, 20(1), E44. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9279

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Degirmentepe, Recep Burak, Yasir Muhammed Akca, Suleyman Alp, Haci Ibrahim Cimen, Deniz Gul, Mustafa Erkoc, Muammer Bozkurt, Tuncay Toprak, and Fikret Halis. "Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery with Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheaths Vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 2–3 Cm Kidney Stones: Is Less Invasive Better?" Canadian Urological Association Journal 20, no. 1 (2026): E44. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9279.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Degirmentepe, Recep Burak, et al. "Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery with Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheaths Vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 2–3 Cm Kidney Stones: Is Less Invasive Better?" Canadian Urological Association Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, 2026, p. E44, https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9279.