APA (7th ed.) Citation

Quinlan, P. T., & Cohen, D. J. (2026). Untested Assumptions and Tenuous Evidence: A Critique of the Dual-Process Account of Moral Judgment. Behavioral Sciences (2076-328X), 16(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010020

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Quinlan, Philip T., and Dale J. Cohen. "Untested Assumptions and Tenuous Evidence: A Critique of the Dual-Process Account of Moral Judgment." Behavioral Sciences (2076-328X) 16, no. 1 (2026): 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010020.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Quinlan, Philip T., and Dale J. Cohen. "Untested Assumptions and Tenuous Evidence: A Critique of the Dual-Process Account of Moral Judgment." Behavioral Sciences (2076-328X), vol. 16, no. 1, 2026, p. 20, https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010020.