APA (7th ed.) Citation

Carosso, A. R., Benedetto, C., Evangelisti, B., Carosso, M., Contangelo, G., Canosa, S., . . . Revelli, A. (2026). "Reverse" Dual Stimulation Has Comparable Efficacy, but Higher Efficiency, than Two Conventional Follicular Phase Stimulations in Poor Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(2), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020582

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Carosso, Andrea Roberto, Chiara Benedetto, Bernadette Evangelisti, Marco Carosso, Gianvito Contangelo, Stefano Canosa, Gianluca Gennarelli, and Alberto Revelli. ""Reverse" Dual Stimulation Has Comparable Efficacy, but Higher Efficiency, than Two Conventional Follicular Phase Stimulations in Poor Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization." Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 2 (2026): 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020582.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Carosso, Andrea Roberto, et al. ""Reverse" Dual Stimulation Has Comparable Efficacy, but Higher Efficiency, than Two Conventional Follicular Phase Stimulations in Poor Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization." Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, 2026, p. 582, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020582.