APA (7th ed.) Citation

Long, Q., Tian, Y., Hu, Y., Xu, Z., Zhang, W., Xu, S., . . . Peng, Y. (2026). Scanner-integrated reconstruction versus post-processing deep learning for low-count 18F-FDG PET/CT: A comparative clinical evaluation. EJNMMI Physics, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-026-00841-z

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Long, Qigang, Yan Tian, Yun Hu, Zhenchun Xu, Wenqian Zhang, Shanshan Xu, Wei Liu, Jingzheng Jin, and Yunsong Peng. "Scanner-integrated Reconstruction Versus Post-processing Deep Learning for Low-count 18F-FDG PET/CT: A Comparative Clinical Evaluation." EJNMMI Physics 13, no. 1 (2026): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-026-00841-z.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Long, Qigang, et al. "Scanner-integrated Reconstruction Versus Post-processing Deep Learning for Low-count 18F-FDG PET/CT: A Comparative Clinical Evaluation." EJNMMI Physics, vol. 13, no. 1, 2026, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-026-00841-z.