Rademaker, E., de Grooth, H., & Cremer, O. L. (2026). Dynamic sepsis endotypes: Instability or expected signal of biological progression? Author's reply. Intensive Care Medicine, 52(3), 615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-026-08340-6
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationRademaker, Emma, Harm-Jan de Grooth, and Olaf L. Cremer. "Dynamic Sepsis Endotypes: Instability or Expected Signal of Biological Progression? Author's Reply." Intensive Care Medicine 52, no. 3 (2026): 615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-026-08340-6.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationRademaker, Emma, et al. "Dynamic Sepsis Endotypes: Instability or Expected Signal of Biological Progression? Author's Reply." Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 52, no. 3, 2026, p. 615, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-026-08340-6.