Bateman, T. M., McGhie, A., Courter, S., Burgett, E., Cullom, S. J., & Case, J. (2012). PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF ULTRA-LOW DOSE STRESS-ONLY SOLID-STATE SPECT: COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY, DOSIMETRY AND OUTCOMES VERSUS TRADITIONAL-DOSE ATTENUATION-CORRECTED STRESS-ONLY ANGER SPECT (NCT01373944). Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), 59, E1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(12)61317-5
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationBateman, Timothy M., Arthur McGhie, Staci Courter, Eric Burgett, S. James Cullom, and James Case. "PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF ULTRA-LOW DOSE STRESS-ONLY SOLID-STATE SPECT: COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY, DOSIMETRY AND OUTCOMES VERSUS TRADITIONAL-DOSE ATTENUATION-CORRECTED STRESS-ONLY ANGER SPECT (NCT01373944)." Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) 59 (2012): E1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(12)61317-5.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationBateman, Timothy M., et al. "PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF ULTRA-LOW DOSE STRESS-ONLY SOLID-STATE SPECT: COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY, DOSIMETRY AND OUTCOMES VERSUS TRADITIONAL-DOSE ATTENUATION-CORRECTED STRESS-ONLY ANGER SPECT (NCT01373944)." Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), vol. 59, 2012, p. E1316, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(12)61317-5.