BURKHARDT, J. D., BIASE, L. D., & NATALE, A. (2013). Do We Need Another Risk Score Protocol When the Good Old-Fashioned Method Works Better? Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 24(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12012
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationBURKHARDT, J. DAVID, LUIGI DI BIASE, and ANDREA NATALE. "Do We Need Another Risk Score Protocol When the Good Old-Fashioned Method Works Better?" Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 24, no. 2 (2013): 146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12012.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationBURKHARDT, J. DAVID, et al. "Do We Need Another Risk Score Protocol When the Good Old-Fashioned Method Works Better?" Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 24, no. 2, 2013, p. 146, https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12012.