View in EDS

A multi-scale health impact assessment of air pollution over the 21st century.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A multi-scale health impact assessment of air pollution over the 21st century.
Authors: Likhvar, Victoria N.1 vlikhvar@gmail.com, Pascal, Mathilde2 m.pascal@invs.sante.fr, Markakis, Konstantinos3 konstantinos.markakis@lmd.polytechnique.fr, Colette, Augustin4 augustin.colette@ineris.fr, Hauglustaine, Didier1 didier.hauglustaine@lsce.ipsl.fr, Valari, Myrto3 myrto.valari@lmd.polytechnique.fr, Klimont, Zbigniew5 klimont@iiasa.ac.at, Medina, Sylvia2 s.medina@invs.sante.fr, Kinney, Patrick6 plk3@columbia.edu
Source: Science of the Total Environment. May2015, Vol. 514, p439-449. 11p.
Subjects: Health impact assessment, Air pollution, Public health, Emissions (Air pollution), Climate change, Comparative studies
Abstract: Background Ozone and PM 2.5 are current risk factors for premature death all over the globe. In coming decades, substantial improvements in public health may be achieved by reducing air pollution. To better understand the potential of emissions policies, studies are needed that assess possible future health impacts under alternative assumptions about future emissions and climate across multiple spatial scales. Method We used consistent climate–air-quality–health modeling framework across three geographical scales (World, Europe and Ile-de-France) to assess future (2030–2050) health impacts of ozone and PM 2.5 under two emissions scenarios (Current Legislation Emissions, CLE, and Maximum Feasible Reductions, MFR). Results Consistently across the scales, we found more reductions in deaths under MFR scenario compared to CLE. 1.5 [95% CI: 0.4, 2.4] million CV deaths could be delayed each year in 2030 compared to 2010 under MFR scenario, 84% of which would occur in Asia, especially in China. In Europe, the benefits under MFR scenario (219 000 CV deaths) are noticeably larger than those under CLE (109 000 CV deaths). In Ile-de-France, under MFR more than 2830 annual CV deaths associated with PM 2.5 changes could be delayed in 2050 compared to 2010. In Paris, ozone-related respiratory mortality should increase under both scenarios. Conclusion Multi-scale HIAs can illustrate the difference in direct consequences of costly mitigation policies and provide results that may help decision-makers choose between different policy alternatives at different scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Science of the Total Environment is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 101920467
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A multi-scale health impact assessment of air pollution over the 21st century.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Likhvar%2C+Victoria+N%2E%22">Likhvar, Victoria N.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> vlikhvar@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pascal%2C+Mathilde%22">Pascal, Mathilde</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> m.pascal@invs.sante.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Markakis%2C+Konstantinos%22">Markakis, Konstantinos</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><i> konstantinos.markakis@lmd.polytechnique.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Colette%2C+Augustin%22">Colette, Augustin</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><i> augustin.colette@ineris.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hauglustaine%2C+Didier%22">Hauglustaine, Didier</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> didier.hauglustaine@lsce.ipsl.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Valari%2C+Myrto%22">Valari, Myrto</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><i> myrto.valari@lmd.polytechnique.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klimont%2C+Zbigniew%22">Klimont, Zbigniew</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><i> klimont@iiasa.ac.at</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Medina%2C+Sylvia%22">Medina, Sylvia</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> s.medina@invs.sante.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kinney%2C+Patrick%22">Kinney, Patrick</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo><i> plk3@columbia.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Science+of+the+Total+Environment%22">Science of the Total Environment</searchLink>. May2015, Vol. 514, p439-449. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+impact+assessment%22">Health impact assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Air+pollution%22">Air pollution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+health%22">Public health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emissions+%28Air+pollution%29%22">Emissions (Air pollution)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Climate+change%22">Climate change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background Ozone and PM 2.5 are current risk factors for premature death all over the globe. In coming decades, substantial improvements in public health may be achieved by reducing air pollution. To better understand the potential of emissions policies, studies are needed that assess possible future health impacts under alternative assumptions about future emissions and climate across multiple spatial scales. Method We used consistent climate–air-quality–health modeling framework across three geographical scales (World, Europe and Ile-de-France) to assess future (2030–2050) health impacts of ozone and PM 2.5 under two emissions scenarios (Current Legislation Emissions, CLE, and Maximum Feasible Reductions, MFR). Results Consistently across the scales, we found more reductions in deaths under MFR scenario compared to CLE. 1.5 [95% CI: 0.4, 2.4] million CV deaths could be delayed each year in 2030 compared to 2010 under MFR scenario, 84% of which would occur in Asia, especially in China. In Europe, the benefits under MFR scenario (219 000 CV deaths) are noticeably larger than those under CLE (109 000 CV deaths). In Ile-de-France, under MFR more than 2830 annual CV deaths associated with PM 2.5 changes could be delayed in 2050 compared to 2010. In Paris, ozone-related respiratory mortality should increase under both scenarios. Conclusion Multi-scale HIAs can illustrate the difference in direct consequences of costly mitigation policies and provide results that may help decision-makers choose between different policy alternatives at different scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Science of the Total Environment is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=101920467
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.002
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 439
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Health impact assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Air pollution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public health
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emissions (Air pollution)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Climate change
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A multi-scale health impact assessment of air pollution over the 21st century.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Likhvar, Victoria N.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pascal, Mathilde
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Markakis, Konstantinos
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Colette, Augustin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hauglustaine, Didier
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Valari, Myrto
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Klimont, Zbigniew
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Medina, Sylvia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kinney, Patrick
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2015
              Type: published
              Y: 2015
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00489697
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 514
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Science of the Total Environment
              Type: main
ResultId 1