Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic differences.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic differences.
Authors: de Vries AH (AUTHOR), Bipat S (AUTHOR), Dekker E (AUTHOR), Liedenbaum MH (AUTHOR), Florie J (AUTHOR), Fockens P (AUTHOR), van der Kraan R (AUTHOR), Mathus-Vliegen EM (AUTHOR), Reitsma JB (AUTHOR), Truyen R (AUTHOR), Vos FM (AUTHOR), Zwinderman AH (AUTHOR), Stoker J (AUTHOR), de Vries, Ayso H1 (AUTHOR), Bipat, Shandra (AUTHOR), Dekker, Evelien (AUTHOR), Liedenbaum, Marjolein H (AUTHOR), Florie, Jasper (AUTHOR), Fockens, Paul (AUTHOR), van der Kraan, Roel (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. Jun2010, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p1404-1413. 10p.
Abstract: Objective: To assess the variability and systematic differences in polyp measurements on optical colonoscopy and CT colonography.Materials: Gastroenterologists measured 51 polyps by visual estimation, forceps comparison and linear probe. CT colonography observers randomly assessed polyp size two-dimensionally (abdominal and intermediate window) and three-dimensionally (manually and semi-automatically). Linear mixed models were used to assess the variability and systematic differences between CT colonography and optical colonoscopy techniques.Results: The variability of forceps and linear probe measurements was comparable and both showed less variability than measurement by visual assessment. Measurements by linear probe were 0.7 mm smaller than measurements by visual assessment or by forceps. The variability of all CT colonography techniques was lower than for measurements by forceps or visual assessment and sometimes lower (only 2D intermediate window and manual 3D) compared with measurements by linear probe. All CT colonography measurements judged polyps to be larger than optical colonoscopy, with differences ranging from 0.7 to 2.3 mm.Conclusion: A linear probe does not reduce the measurement variability of endoscopists compared with the forceps. Measurement differences between observers on CT colonography were usually smaller than at optical colonoscopy. Polyps appeared larger when using various CT colonography techniques than when measured during optical colonoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 105187997
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic differences.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22de+Vries+AH%22">de Vries AH</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bipat+S%22">Bipat S</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dekker+E%22">Dekker E</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Liedenbaum+MH%22">Liedenbaum MH</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Florie+J%22">Florie J</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fockens+P%22">Fockens P</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+der+Kraan+R%22">van der Kraan R</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mathus-Vliegen+EM%22">Mathus-Vliegen EM</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Reitsma+JB%22">Reitsma JB</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Truyen+R%22">Truyen R</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vos+FM%22">Vos FM</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zwinderman+AH%22">Zwinderman AH</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stoker+J%22">Stoker J</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22de+Vries%2C+Ayso+H%22">de Vries, Ayso H</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bipat%2C+Shandra%22">Bipat, Shandra</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dekker%2C+Evelien%22">Dekker, Evelien</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Liedenbaum%2C+Marjolein+H%22">Liedenbaum, Marjolein H</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Florie%2C+Jasper%22">Florie, Jasper</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fockens%2C+Paul%22">Fockens, Paul</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van+der+Kraan%2C+Roel%22">van der Kraan, Roel</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Radiology%22">European Radiology</searchLink>. Jun2010, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p1404-1413. 10p.
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: <bold>Objective: </bold>To assess the variability and systematic differences in polyp measurements on optical colonoscopy and CT colonography.<bold>Materials: </bold>Gastroenterologists measured 51 polyps by visual estimation, forceps comparison and linear probe. CT colonography observers randomly assessed polyp size two-dimensionally (abdominal and intermediate window) and three-dimensionally (manually and semi-automatically). Linear mixed models were used to assess the variability and systematic differences between CT colonography and optical colonoscopy techniques.<bold>Results: </bold>The variability of forceps and linear probe measurements was comparable and both showed less variability than measurement by visual assessment. Measurements by linear probe were 0.7 mm smaller than measurements by visual assessment or by forceps. The variability of all CT colonography techniques was lower than for measurements by forceps or visual assessment and sometimes lower (only 2D intermediate window and manual 3D) compared with measurements by linear probe. All CT colonography measurements judged polyps to be larger than optical colonoscopy, with differences ranging from 0.7 to 2.3 mm.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>A linear probe does not reduce the measurement variability of endoscopists compared with the forceps. Measurement differences between observers on CT colonography were usually smaller than at optical colonoscopy. Polyps appeared larger when using various CT colonography techniques than when measured during optical colonoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=105187997
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00330-009-1683-0
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 1404
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic differences.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: de Vries AH
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bipat S
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dekker E
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Liedenbaum MH
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Florie J
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fockens P
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van der Kraan R
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mathus-Vliegen EM
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Reitsma JB
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Truyen R
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vos FM
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zwinderman AH
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stoker J
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: de Vries, Ayso H
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bipat, Shandra
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dekker, Evelien
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Liedenbaum, Marjolein H
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Florie, Jasper
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fockens, Paul
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van der Kraan, Roel
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2010
              Type: published
              Y: 2010
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09387994
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 20
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Radiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1