View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

MR angiography with parallel acquisition for assessment of the visceral arteries: comparison with conventional MR angiography and 64-detector-row computed tomography.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: MR angiography with parallel acquisition for assessment of the visceral arteries: comparison with conventional MR angiography and 64-detector-row computed tomography.
Authors: Sutter R (AUTHOR), Heilmaier C (AUTHOR), Lutz AM (AUTHOR), Weishaupt D (AUTHOR), Seifert B (AUTHOR), Willmann JK (AUTHOR), Sutter, Reto1 (AUTHOR), Heilmaier, Christina (AUTHOR), Lutz, Amelie M (AUTHOR), Weishaupt, Dominik (AUTHOR), Seifert, Burkhardt (AUTHOR), Willmann, Jürgen K (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. Nov2009, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p2679-2688. 10p.
Abstract: The purpose of the study was to retrospectively compare three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (conventional MRA) with MRA accelerated by a parallel acquisition technique (fast MRA) for the assessment of visceral arteries, using 64-detector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) as the reference standard. Eighteen patients underwent fast MRA (imaging time 17 s), conventional MRA (29 s) and MDCTA of the abdomen and pelvis. Two independent readers assessed subjective image quality and the presence of arterial stenosis. Data were analysed on per-patient and per-segment bases. Fast MRA yielded better subjective image quality in all segments compared with conventional MRA (P = 0.012 for reader 1, P = 0.055 for reader 2) because of fewer motion-induced artefacts. Sensitivity and specificity of fast MRA for the detection of arterial stenosis were 100% for both readers. Sensitivity of conventional MRA was 89% for both readers, and specificity was 100% (reader 1) and 99% (reader 2). Differences in sensitivity between the two types of MRA were not significant for either reader. Interobserver agreement for the detection of arterial stenosis was excellent for fast (kappa = 1.00) and good for conventional MRA (kappa = 0.76). Thus, subjective image quality of visceral arteries remains good on fast MRA compared with conventional MRA, and the two techniques do not differ substantially in the grading of arterial stenosis, despite the markedly reduced acquisition time of fast MRA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 105230780
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: MR angiography with parallel acquisition for assessment of the visceral arteries: comparison with conventional MR angiography and 64-detector-row computed tomography.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sutter+R%22">Sutter R</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heilmaier+C%22">Heilmaier C</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lutz+AM%22">Lutz AM</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Weishaupt+D%22">Weishaupt D</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Seifert+B%22">Seifert B</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Willmann+JK%22">Willmann JK</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sutter%2C+Reto%22">Sutter, Reto</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heilmaier%2C+Christina%22">Heilmaier, Christina</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lutz%2C+Amelie+M%22">Lutz, Amelie M</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Weishaupt%2C+Dominik%22">Weishaupt, Dominik</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Seifert%2C+Burkhardt%22">Seifert, Burkhardt</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Willmann%2C+Jürgen+K%22">Willmann, Jürgen K</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Radiology%22">European Radiology</searchLink>. Nov2009, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p2679-2688. 10p.
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The purpose of the study was to retrospectively compare three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (conventional MRA) with MRA accelerated by a parallel acquisition technique (fast MRA) for the assessment of visceral arteries, using 64-detector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) as the reference standard. Eighteen patients underwent fast MRA (imaging time 17 s), conventional MRA (29 s) and MDCTA of the abdomen and pelvis. Two independent readers assessed subjective image quality and the presence of arterial stenosis. Data were analysed on per-patient and per-segment bases. Fast MRA yielded better subjective image quality in all segments compared with conventional MRA (P = 0.012 for reader 1, P = 0.055 for reader 2) because of fewer motion-induced artefacts. Sensitivity and specificity of fast MRA for the detection of arterial stenosis were 100% for both readers. Sensitivity of conventional MRA was 89% for both readers, and specificity was 100% (reader 1) and 99% (reader 2). Differences in sensitivity between the two types of MRA were not significant for either reader. Interobserver agreement for the detection of arterial stenosis was excellent for fast (kappa = 1.00) and good for conventional MRA (kappa = 0.76). Thus, subjective image quality of visceral arteries remains good on fast MRA compared with conventional MRA, and the two techniques do not differ substantially in the grading of arterial stenosis, despite the markedly reduced acquisition time of fast MRA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=105230780
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00330-009-1473-8
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 2679
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: MR angiography with parallel acquisition for assessment of the visceral arteries: comparison with conventional MR angiography and 64-detector-row computed tomography.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sutter R
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Heilmaier C
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lutz AM
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Weishaupt D
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Seifert B
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Willmann JK
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sutter, Reto
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Heilmaier, Christina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lutz, Amelie M
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Weishaupt, Dominik
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Seifert, Burkhardt
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Willmann, Jürgen K
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2009
              Type: published
              Y: 2009
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09387994
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 19
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Radiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1