Whole-lung densitometry versus visual assessment of emphysema.
Saved in:
| Title: | Whole-lung densitometry versus visual assessment of emphysema. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Cavigli E (AUTHOR), Camiciottoli G (AUTHOR), Diciotti S (AUTHOR), Orlandi I (AUTHOR), Spinelli C (AUTHOR), Meoni E (AUTHOR), Grassi L (AUTHOR), Farfalla C (AUTHOR), Pistolesi M (AUTHOR), Falaschi F (AUTHOR), Mascalchi M (AUTHOR), Cavigli, Edoardo1 (AUTHOR), Camiciottoli, Gianna (AUTHOR), Diciotti, Stefano (AUTHOR), Orlandi, Ilaria (AUTHOR), Spinelli, Cheti (AUTHOR), Meoni, Eleonora (AUTHOR), Grassi, Luca (AUTHOR), Farfalla, Carmela (AUTHOR), Pistolesi, Massimo (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | European Radiology. Jul2009, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p1686-1692. 7p. |
| Abstract: | We compared whole-lung densitometry with visual evaluation of pulmonary emphysema. Thirty patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease underwent multi-detector CT (150 mAs and 0.75 collimation) with double reconstruction: thick (5-mm) slices with smooth filter for whole-lung densitometry and thin (1 mm) slices with sharp filter for visual assessment (one of every ten slices). Densitometry and visual assessment were performed by three operators each, and the time required for assessment, the inter-observer agreement and the correlation with the results of the diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DL(CO)) in the same patients were computed. The average time for densitometry (8.49 +/- 0.13 min) was significantly longer (p < 0.0001) than that for visual evaluation (5.14 +/- 0.11 min). However, the inter-operator agreement ranged between "moderate" to "almost perfect" for densitometry (kappa range 0.58-0.87) and "slight" for visual (kappa = 0.20) assessment. The correlation coefficients of DL(CO) with relative area at -960 and -970 Hounsfield units (HU) (both r = -0.66) and of the first percentile point of lung density (r = 0.66) were slightly stronger than that of the visual score (r = -0.62). Densitometry should be preferred to visual assessment because it enables a more reproducible evaluation of the extent of pulmonary emphysema, which can be carried out on the entire lung in a reasonable amount of time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 105349669 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Whole-lung densitometry versus visual assessment of emphysema. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cavigli+E%22">Cavigli E</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Camiciottoli+G%22">Camiciottoli G</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Diciotti+S%22">Diciotti S</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Orlandi+I%22">Orlandi I</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spinelli+C%22">Spinelli C</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meoni+E%22">Meoni E</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grassi+L%22">Grassi L</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Farfalla+C%22">Farfalla C</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pistolesi+M%22">Pistolesi M</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Falaschi+F%22">Falaschi F</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mascalchi+M%22">Mascalchi M</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cavigli%2C+Edoardo%22">Cavigli, Edoardo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Camiciottoli%2C+Gianna%22">Camiciottoli, Gianna</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Diciotti%2C+Stefano%22">Diciotti, Stefano</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Orlandi%2C+Ilaria%22">Orlandi, Ilaria</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spinelli%2C+Cheti%22">Spinelli, Cheti</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meoni%2C+Eleonora%22">Meoni, Eleonora</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grassi%2C+Luca%22">Grassi, Luca</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Farfalla%2C+Carmela%22">Farfalla, Carmela</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pistolesi%2C+Massimo%22">Pistolesi, Massimo</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Radiology%22">European Radiology</searchLink>. Jul2009, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p1686-1692. 7p. – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: We compared whole-lung densitometry with visual evaluation of pulmonary emphysema. Thirty patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease underwent multi-detector CT (150 mAs and 0.75 collimation) with double reconstruction: thick (5-mm) slices with smooth filter for whole-lung densitometry and thin (1 mm) slices with sharp filter for visual assessment (one of every ten slices). Densitometry and visual assessment were performed by three operators each, and the time required for assessment, the inter-observer agreement and the correlation with the results of the diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DL(CO)) in the same patients were computed. The average time for densitometry (8.49 +/- 0.13 min) was significantly longer (p < 0.0001) than that for visual evaluation (5.14 +/- 0.11 min). However, the inter-operator agreement ranged between "moderate" to "almost perfect" for densitometry (kappa range 0.58-0.87) and "slight" for visual (kappa = 0.20) assessment. The correlation coefficients of DL(CO) with relative area at -960 and -970 Hounsfield units (HU) (both r = -0.66) and of the first percentile point of lung density (r = 0.66) were slightly stronger than that of the visual score (r = -0.62). Densitometry should be preferred to visual assessment because it enables a more reproducible evaluation of the extent of pulmonary emphysema, which can be carried out on the entire lung in a reasonable amount of time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=105349669 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s00330-009-1320-y Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 1686 Titles: – TitleFull: Whole-lung densitometry versus visual assessment of emphysema. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cavigli E – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Camiciottoli G – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Diciotti S – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Orlandi I – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Spinelli C – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Meoni E – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Grassi L – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Farfalla C – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pistolesi M – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Falaschi F – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mascalchi M – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cavigli, Edoardo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Camiciottoli, Gianna – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Diciotti, Stefano – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Orlandi, Ilaria – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Spinelli, Cheti – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Meoni, Eleonora – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Grassi, Luca – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Farfalla, Carmela – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pistolesi, Massimo IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul2009 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09387994 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 19 – Type: issue Value: 7 Titles: – TitleFull: European Radiology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |