View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
Authors: Kim MJ (AUTHOR), Kim EK (AUTHOR), Kwak JY (AUTHOR), Son EJ (AUTHOR), Youk JH (AUTHOR), Choi SH (AUTHOR), Han M (AUTHOR), Oh KK (AUTHOR), Kim, Min Jung1 (AUTHOR), Kim, Eun-Kyung (AUTHOR), Kwak, Jin Young (AUTHOR), Son, Eun Ju (AUTHOR), Youk, Ji Hyun (AUTHOR), Choi, Seon Hyeong (AUTHOR), Han, Mooyoung (AUTHOR), Oh, Ki Keun (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. Feb2009, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p310-317. 8p.
Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of microcalcifications in zoomed digital contact mammography with digital magnification mammography. Three radiologists with different levels of experience in mammography reviewed 120 microcalcification clusters in 111 patients with a full-field digital mammography system relying on digital magnification mammogram (MAG) images and zoomed images from contact mammography (ZOOM) using commercially available zooming systems on monitors. Each radiologist estimated the probability of malignancy and rated the image quality and confidence rate. Performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. All three radiologists rated MAG images higher than ZOOM images for sensitivity with statistical significance (average value, 92% vs. 87%, P<0.05) and performance by ROC analysis improved with MAG imaging. The confidence rate for diagnosis decision and the assessment of lesion characteristics were also better in MAG images than in ZOOM images with statistical significance (P<0.0001). Digital magnification mammography can enhance diagnostic performance when characterizing microcalcifications. Images zoomed from digital contact mammography cannot serve as an alternative to direct magnification digital mammography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 105624985
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kim+MJ%22&quot;&gt;Kim MJ&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kim+EK%22&quot;&gt;Kim EK&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kwak+JY%22&quot;&gt;Kwak JY&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Son+EJ%22&quot;&gt;Son EJ&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Youk+JH%22&quot;&gt;Youk JH&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Choi+SH%22&quot;&gt;Choi SH&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Han+M%22&quot;&gt;Han M&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Oh+KK%22&quot;&gt;Oh KK&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kim%2C+Min+Jung%22&quot;&gt;Kim, Min Jung&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kim%2C+Eun-Kyung%22&quot;&gt;Kim, Eun-Kyung&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kwak%2C+Jin+Young%22&quot;&gt;Kwak, Jin Young&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Son%2C+Eun+Ju%22&quot;&gt;Son, Eun Ju&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Youk%2C+Ji+Hyun%22&quot;&gt;Youk, Ji Hyun&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Choi%2C+Seon+Hyeong%22&quot;&gt;Choi, Seon Hyeong&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Han%2C+Mooyoung%22&quot;&gt;Han, Mooyoung&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Oh%2C+Ki+Keun%22&quot;&gt;Oh, Ki Keun&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22European+Radiology%22&quot;&gt;European Radiology&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Feb2009, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p310-317. 8p.
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of microcalcifications in zoomed digital contact mammography with digital magnification mammography. Three radiologists with different levels of experience in mammography reviewed 120 microcalcification clusters in 111 patients with a full-field digital mammography system relying on digital magnification mammogram (MAG) images and zoomed images from contact mammography (ZOOM) using commercially available zooming systems on monitors. Each radiologist estimated the probability of malignancy and rated the image quality and confidence rate. Performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. All three radiologists rated MAG images higher than ZOOM images for sensitivity with statistical significance (average value, 92% vs. 87%, P&lt;0.05) and performance by ROC analysis improved with MAG imaging. The confidence rate for diagnosis decision and the assessment of lesion characteristics were also better in MAG images than in ZOOM images with statistical significance (P&lt;0.0001). Digital magnification mammography can enhance diagnostic performance when characterizing microcalcifications. Images zoomed from digital contact mammography cannot serve as an alternative to direct magnification digital mammography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=105624985
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00330-008-1135-2
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 8
        StartPage: 310
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kim MJ
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kim EK
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kwak JY
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Son EJ
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Youk JH
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Choi SH
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Han M
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Oh KK
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kim, Min Jung
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kim, Eun-Kyung
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kwak, Jin Young
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Son, Eun Ju
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Youk, Ji Hyun
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Choi, Seon Hyeong
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Han, Mooyoung
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Oh, Ki Keun
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2009
              Type: published
              Y: 2009
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09387994
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 19
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Radiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1