View in EDS

Flexural Behavior of Steel Reinforced Lightweight Concrete Slab with Bamboo Permanent Formworks.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Flexural Behavior of Steel Reinforced Lightweight Concrete Slab with Bamboo Permanent Formworks.
Authors: Akmaluddin, null1 akmaluddin@unram.ac.id, Pathurahman, null1, Suparjo, null1, Gazalba, Zaedar1
Source: Procedia Engineering. 2015, Vol. 125, p865-872. 8p.
Subjects: Flexural strength, Lightweight concrete, Concrete slabs, Bamboo, Mechanical loads, Cross-sectional method
Abstract: One-way steel reinforced pumice lightweight concrete slabs with bamboo permanent formwork to support building structure system are discussed. This paper aims to study the behavior and strength resistant of the slabs under flexural loading test. Eleven slab specimen divided into four groups namely BSN, BSL, BSM and BSH were considered. The slabs cross section was 550 x 120 mm with steel reinforcement ratio of 0% (BSN), 0.39% (BSL), 0.48% (BSM) and 0.77% (BSH). The slabs of 2.7 m length were supported at 2.5 m clear span. BSN was used as control specimen. The slabs were tested under two symmetrical point load acting on 1/3 clear span. The results showed that the first cracking load of BSH, BSM and BSL were generally higher than that of BSN. The present of steel reinforcement in the bamboo slab proportionally increased the slab capacities. Normalized ultimate load of BSL, BSM and BSH to BSN were 2.27, 2.64 and 4.04 respectively, where the average ultimate load capacity of BSN was 15.575 kN. Service load to ultimate load ratio of the slab with steel reinforcement were obtained varies between 0.37 and 0.57. Increasing the number of reinforcement ratio, it was found to decrease the slab ductility. The ductility index of BSL, BSM and BSH were 2.84, 2.09 and 1.34 respectively while BSN ductility index was 1.71. The effect of additional lateral reinforcement in the slab increased the slab ductility of 3.85, 2.15 and 1.56 for BSL, BSM and BSH respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Procedia Engineering is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:One-way steel reinforced pumice lightweight concrete slabs with bamboo permanent formwork to support building structure system are discussed. This paper aims to study the behavior and strength resistant of the slabs under flexural loading test. Eleven slab specimen divided into four groups namely BSN, BSL, BSM and BSH were considered. The slabs cross section was 550 x 120 mm with steel reinforcement ratio of 0% (BSN), 0.39% (BSL), 0.48% (BSM) and 0.77% (BSH). The slabs of 2.7 m length were supported at 2.5 m clear span. BSN was used as control specimen. The slabs were tested under two symmetrical point load acting on 1/3 clear span. The results showed that the first cracking load of BSH, BSM and BSL were generally higher than that of BSN. The present of steel reinforcement in the bamboo slab proportionally increased the slab capacities. Normalized ultimate load of BSL, BSM and BSH to BSN were 2.27, 2.64 and 4.04 respectively, where the average ultimate load capacity of BSN was 15.575 kN. Service load to ultimate load ratio of the slab with steel reinforcement were obtained varies between 0.37 and 0.57. Increasing the number of reinforcement ratio, it was found to decrease the slab ductility. The ductility index of BSL, BSM and BSH were 2.84, 2.09 and 1.34 respectively while BSN ductility index was 1.71. The effect of additional lateral reinforcement in the slab increased the slab ductility of 3.85, 2.15 and 1.56 for BSL, BSM and BSH respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:18777058
DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.054