Earthquake Preparedness and Response: Comparison of the United States and Japan.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Earthquake Preparedness and Response: Comparison of the United States and Japan.
Authors:	GREER, ALEX¹ agreer@udel.edu
Source:	Leadership & Management in Engineering. Jul2012, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p111-125. 15p.
Subjects:	Disaster resilience, Emergency management, Earthquake engineering, Earthquake hazard analysis, Earthquakes, Earthquake damage, Comparative studies
Geographic Terms:	United States, Japan
Abstract:	Earthquakes often occur with little to no warning and have the potential to cause enormous amounts of destruction and death. Countries with means have developed complex emergency management systems to address this constant threat. The United States and Japan were chosen for comparison because they share a similar amount of risk and have experienced large earthquakes in the last 20 years. These two countries approach this problem in drastically different ways; the United States uses a bottom-up approach, giving a large amount of freedom to local governments to address this risk. The Japanese system spreads responsibility through a directive approach, with the central government taking care of mitigation and parts of recovery, leaving the rest to be sorted out by the prefectures and local governments. This paper focuses specifically on the ways in which these two countries approach preparedness and recovery. The paper concludes with a short analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each system, offering suggestions to strengthen future approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Leadership & Management in Engineering is the property of American Society of Civil Engineers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Engineering Source

Description
Abstract:	Earthquakes often occur with little to no warning and have the potential to cause enormous amounts of destruction and death. Countries with means have developed complex emergency management systems to address this constant threat. The United States and Japan were chosen for comparison because they share a similar amount of risk and have experienced large earthquakes in the last 20 years. These two countries approach this problem in drastically different ways; the United States uses a bottom-up approach, giving a large amount of freedom to local governments to address this risk. The Japanese system spreads responsibility through a directive approach, with the central government taking care of mitigation and parts of recovery, leaving the rest to be sorted out by the prefectures and local governments. This paper focuses specifically on the ways in which these two countries approach preparedness and recovery. The paper concludes with a short analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each system, offering suggestions to strengthen future approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	15326748
DOI:	10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000179