Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse.
Authors: Faniel, Ixchel M.1 fanieli@oclc.org, Kriesberg, Adam2 akriesbe@umich.edu, Yakel, Elizabeth2 yakel@umich.edu
Source: Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology. Jun2016, Vol. 67 Issue 6, p1404-1416. 13p. 4 Charts.
Subjects: Conceptual structures, Database management, Discriminant analysis, Experimental design, Research methodology, Research funding, Satisfaction, Scientists, Surveys, Trust, Multiple regression analysis, Access to information, Periodical articles, Impact factor (Citation analysis)
Abstract: Much of the recent research on digital data repositories has focused on assessing either the trustworthiness of the repository or quantifying the frequency of data reuse. Satisfaction with the data reuse experience, however, has not been widely studied. Drawing from the information systems and information science literature, we developed a model to examine the relationship between data quality and data reusers' satisfaction. Based on a survey of 1,480 journal article authors who cited Inter- University Consortium for Political and Social Research ( ICPSR) data in published papers from 2008-2012, we found several data quality attributes-completeness, accessibility, ease of operation, and credibility-had significant positive associations with data reusers' satisfaction. There was also a significant positive relationship between documentation quality and data reusers' satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 115197701
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Faniel%2C+Ixchel+M%2E%22">Faniel, Ixchel M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> fanieli@oclc.org</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kriesberg%2C+Adam%22">Kriesberg, Adam</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> akriesbe@umich.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yakel%2C+Elizabeth%22">Yakel, Elizabeth</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> yakel@umich.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+the+Association+for+Information+Science+%26+Technology%22">Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology</searchLink>. Jun2016, Vol. 67 Issue 6, p1404-1416. 13p. 4 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conceptual+structures%22">Conceptual structures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Database+management%22">Database management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discriminant+analysis%22">Discriminant analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+design%22">Experimental design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Satisfaction%22">Satisfaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientists%22">Scientists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trust%22">Trust</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+regression+analysis%22">Multiple regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Access+to+information%22">Access to information</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Periodical+articles%22">Periodical articles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Impact+factor+%28Citation+analysis%29%22">Impact factor (Citation analysis)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Much of the recent research on digital data repositories has focused on assessing either the trustworthiness of the repository or quantifying the frequency of data reuse. Satisfaction with the data reuse experience, however, has not been widely studied. Drawing from the information systems and information science literature, we developed a model to examine the relationship between data quality and data reusers' satisfaction. Based on a survey of 1,480 journal article authors who cited Inter- University Consortium for Political and Social Research ( ICPSR) data in published papers from 2008-2012, we found several data quality attributes-completeness, accessibility, ease of operation, and credibility-had significant positive associations with data reusers' satisfaction. There was also a significant positive relationship between documentation quality and data reusers' satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=115197701
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/asi.23480
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 1404
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Conceptual structures
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Database management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discriminant analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experimental design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scientists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Trust
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multiple regression analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Access to information
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Periodical articles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Impact factor (Citation analysis)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Faniel, Ixchel M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kriesberg, Adam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yakel, Elizabeth
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2016
              Type: published
              Y: 2016
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 23301635
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 67
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology
              Type: main
ResultId 1