Toward the Ecological Footprint of the use and maintenance phase of buildings: Utility consumption and cleaning tasks.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Toward the Ecological Footprint of the use and maintenance phase of buildings: Utility consumption and cleaning tasks.
Authors: Martínez-Rocamora, Alejandro1 rocamora@us.es, Solís-Guzmán, Jaime1, Marrero, Madelyn1
Source: Ecological Indicators. Oct2016, Vol. 69, p66-77. 12p.
Subjects: Ecological impact, Building utilization, Building maintenance, Building cleaning, Building design & construction, Labor
Abstract: Due to poor design of buildings in terms of maintenance, there are a number of buildings today that remain extremely expensive to maintain, both economically and environmentally. In order to mitigate these overheads, the development of a cost database is needed with which the resources required to clean and maintain buildings can be estimated. This paper presents a methodology to estimate these costs and the environmental impact, in terms of Ecological Footprint (EF), associated to the utility consumption and to the cleaning tasks necessary during the service life of buildings. Given the numerous peculiarities identified for this type of activity compared to the construction of buildings, it is necessary to define a new methodology of calculation, with its own assumptions and formulae. This methodology is then applied to the case of a college hall of residence that houses up to 139 residents. The results show that the annual EF of cleaning tasks accounts for 11.42% of the EF of utility consumption. Together they total 67.334 global hectares per year (gha/yr), 88% of which corresponds to the carbon footprint. Within the EF of cleaning, about 71% is due to food consumed by labor, while 26% is due to the manufacture of cleaning products and tools, which are equally divided among the six categories of productive land. The development of this methodology is essential for the detailed quantification of the environmental impact of utility consumption and cleaning tasks that occur during the service life of buildings. The use of discount rates on results is included in terms of the EF of a baseline year, as an equivalent to the discount rate in economic terms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ecological Indicators is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 116630737
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Toward the Ecological Footprint of the use and maintenance phase of buildings: Utility consumption and cleaning tasks.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Martínez-Rocamora%2C+Alejandro%22">Martínez-Rocamora, Alejandro</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> rocamora@us.es</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Solís-Guzmán%2C+Jaime%22">Solís-Guzmán, Jaime</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marrero%2C+Madelyn%22">Marrero, Madelyn</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ecological+Indicators%22">Ecological Indicators</searchLink>. Oct2016, Vol. 69, p66-77. 12p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ecological+impact%22">Ecological impact</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Building+utilization%22">Building utilization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Building+maintenance%22">Building maintenance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Building+cleaning%22">Building cleaning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Building+design+%26+construction%22">Building design & construction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Labor%22">Labor</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Due to poor design of buildings in terms of maintenance, there are a number of buildings today that remain extremely expensive to maintain, both economically and environmentally. In order to mitigate these overheads, the development of a cost database is needed with which the resources required to clean and maintain buildings can be estimated. This paper presents a methodology to estimate these costs and the environmental impact, in terms of Ecological Footprint (EF), associated to the utility consumption and to the cleaning tasks necessary during the service life of buildings. Given the numerous peculiarities identified for this type of activity compared to the construction of buildings, it is necessary to define a new methodology of calculation, with its own assumptions and formulae. This methodology is then applied to the case of a college hall of residence that houses up to 139 residents. The results show that the annual EF of cleaning tasks accounts for 11.42% of the EF of utility consumption. Together they total 67.334 global hectares per year (gha/yr), 88% of which corresponds to the carbon footprint. Within the EF of cleaning, about 71% is due to food consumed by labor, while 26% is due to the manufacture of cleaning products and tools, which are equally divided among the six categories of productive land. The development of this methodology is essential for the detailed quantification of the environmental impact of utility consumption and cleaning tasks that occur during the service life of buildings. The use of discount rates on results is included in terms of the EF of a baseline year, as an equivalent to the discount rate in economic terms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ecological Indicators is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=116630737
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.007
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 66
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Ecological impact
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Building utilization
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Building maintenance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Building cleaning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Building design & construction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Labor
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Toward the Ecological Footprint of the use and maintenance phase of buildings: Utility consumption and cleaning tasks.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Martínez-Rocamora, Alejandro
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Solís-Guzmán, Jaime
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Marrero, Madelyn
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2016
              Type: published
              Y: 2016
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1470160X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 69
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ecological Indicators
              Type: main
ResultId 1