EVOLUTION, NOT REVOLUTION.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: EVOLUTION, NOT REVOLUTION.
Authors: Selic, Bran1 bselic@rational.com, Ramackers, Guus2 Guus.Ramackers@oracle.com, Kobryn, Cris3 Cris.Kobryn@telelogic.com
Source: Communications of the ACM. Nov2002, Vol. 45 Issue 11, p70-72. 3p.
Subjects: Unified modeling language, Object Management Group Inc., Object-oriented methods (Computer science), Technical specifications, Computer architecture, Computer science
Abstract: Practitioners and researchers of Object Management Group Inc. (OMG) has adopted Unified Modeling Language (UML) ever since OMG's foundation in 1997. There has been a strong pressure to improve the effectiveness of UML and provide it with a multitude of new features. The original UML specifications, culminating with UML1, were based on input from a relatively large team of experts from different companies and with diverse backgrounds. It was inevitable that such diversity would result in ambiguities and semantic overlaps that have since prompted many questions about the specific meaning of certain UML concepts. A primary requirement for the future UML2 specification is their elimination by providing a precise definition of the semantics of each UML concept, including its dynamic semantics. UML2 must consolidate UML's existing features rather than add a multitude of new and changed ones. This consolidation must yield greater precision and better modularization, both crucial to achieving objectives of OMG's Model Driven Architecture.
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 12126219
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Periodical
PubTypeId: serialPeriodical
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: EVOLUTION, NOT REVOLUTION.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Selic%2C+Bran%22">Selic, Bran</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> bselic@rational.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ramackers%2C+Guus%22">Ramackers, Guus</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> Guus.Ramackers@oracle.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kobryn%2C+Cris%22">Kobryn, Cris</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><i> Cris.Kobryn@telelogic.com</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Communications+of+the+ACM%22">Communications of the ACM</searchLink>. Nov2002, Vol. 45 Issue 11, p70-72. 3p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Unified+modeling+language%22">Unified modeling language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Object+Management+Group+Inc%2E%22">Object Management Group Inc.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Object-oriented+methods+%28Computer+science%29%22">Object-oriented methods (Computer science)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technical+specifications%22">Technical specifications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+architecture%22">Computer architecture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+science%22">Computer science</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Practitioners and researchers of Object Management Group Inc. (OMG) has adopted Unified Modeling Language (UML) ever since OMG's foundation in 1997. There has been a strong pressure to improve the effectiveness of UML and provide it with a multitude of new features. The original UML specifications, culminating with UML1, were based on input from a relatively large team of experts from different companies and with diverse backgrounds. It was inevitable that such diversity would result in ambiguities and semantic overlaps that have since prompted many questions about the specific meaning of certain UML concepts. A primary requirement for the future UML2 specification is their elimination by providing a precise definition of the semantics of each UML concept, including its dynamic semantics. UML2 must consolidate UML's existing features rather than add a multitude of new and changed ones. This consolidation must yield greater precision and better modularization, both crucial to achieving objectives of OMG's Model Driven Architecture.
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=12126219
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1145/581571.581595
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 3
        StartPage: 70
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Unified modeling language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Object Management Group Inc.
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Object-oriented methods (Computer science)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technical specifications
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer architecture
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer science
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: EVOLUTION, NOT REVOLUTION.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Selic, Bran
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ramackers, Guus
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kobryn, Cris
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2002
              Type: published
              Y: 2002
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00010782
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 45
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Communications of the ACM
              Type: main
ResultId 1