Optimal reconstruction and quantitative image features for computer-aided diagnosis tools for breast CT.
Saved in:
| Title: | Optimal reconstruction and quantitative image features for computer-aided diagnosis tools for breast CT. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Lee, Juhun1 leej15@upmc.edu, Nishikawa, Robert M.1, Reiser, Ingrid2, Boone, John M.3 |
| Source: | Medical Physics. May2017, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p1846-1856. 11p. |
| Subjects: | Breast cancer diagnosis, Diagnostic imaging, Image reconstruction, Computers in medicine, Image quality analysis |
| Abstract: | Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal representative reconstruction and quantitative image feature set for a computer-aided diagnosis ( CADx) scheme for dedicated breast computer tomography ( bCT). Method We used 93 bCT scans that contain 102 breast lesions (62 malignant, 40 benign). Using an iterative image reconstruction ( IIR) algorithm, we created 37 reconstructions with different image appearances for each case. In addition, we added a clinical reconstruction for comparison purposes. We used image sharpness, determined by the gradient of gray value in a parenchymal portion of the reconstructed breast, as a surrogate measure of the image qualities/appearances for the 38 reconstructions. After segmentation of the breast lesion, we extracted 23 quantitative image features. Using leave-one-out-cross-validation ( LOOCV), we conducted the feature selection, classifier training, and testing. For this study, we used the linear discriminant analysis classifier. Then, we selected the representative reconstruction and feature set for the classifier with the best diagnostic performance among all reconstructions and feature sets. Then, we conducted an observer study with six radiologists using a subset of breast lesions ( N = 50). Using 1000 bootstrap samples, we compared the diagnostic performance of the trained classifier to those of the radiologists. Result The diagnostic performance of the trained classifier increased as the image sharpness of a given reconstruction increased. Among combinations of reconstructions and quantitative image feature sets, we selected one of the sharp reconstructions and three quantitative image feature sets with the first three highest diagnostic performances under LOOCV as the representative reconstruction and feature set for the classifier. The classifier on the representative reconstruction and feature set achieved better diagnostic performance with an area under the ROC curve ( AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI = [0.81, 0.98]) than those of the radiologists, where their maximum AUC was 0.78 (95% CI = [0.63, 0.90]). Moreover, the partial AUC, at 90% sensitivity or higher, of the classifier ( pAUC = 0.085 with 95% CI = [0.063, 0.094]) was statistically better ( P-value < 0.0001) than those of the radiologists (maximum pAUC = 0.009 with 95% CI = [0.003, 0.024]). Conclusion We found that image sharpness measure can be a good candidate to estimate the diagnostic performance of a given CADx algorithm. In addition, we found that there exists a reconstruction (i.e., sharp reconstruction) and a feature set that maximizes the diagnostic performance of a CADx algorithm. On this optimal representative reconstruction and feature set, the CADx algorithm outperformed radiologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Physics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 122988709 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Optimal reconstruction and quantitative image features for computer-aided diagnosis tools for breast CT. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lee%2C+Juhun%22">Lee, Juhun</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> leej15@upmc.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nishikawa%2C+Robert+M%2E%22">Nishikawa, Robert M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Reiser%2C+Ingrid%22">Reiser, Ingrid</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boone%2C+John+M%2E%22">Boone, John M.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Physics%22">Medical Physics</searchLink>. May2017, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p1846-1856. 11p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Breast+cancer+diagnosis%22">Breast cancer diagnosis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diagnostic+imaging%22">Diagnostic imaging</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Image+reconstruction%22">Image reconstruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computers+in+medicine%22">Computers in medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Image+quality+analysis%22">Image quality analysis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal representative reconstruction and quantitative image feature set for a computer-aided diagnosis ( CADx) scheme for dedicated breast computer tomography ( bCT). Method We used 93 bCT scans that contain 102 breast lesions (62 malignant, 40 benign). Using an iterative image reconstruction ( IIR) algorithm, we created 37 reconstructions with different image appearances for each case. In addition, we added a clinical reconstruction for comparison purposes. We used image sharpness, determined by the gradient of gray value in a parenchymal portion of the reconstructed breast, as a surrogate measure of the image qualities/appearances for the 38 reconstructions. After segmentation of the breast lesion, we extracted 23 quantitative image features. Using leave-one-out-cross-validation ( LOOCV), we conducted the feature selection, classifier training, and testing. For this study, we used the linear discriminant analysis classifier. Then, we selected the representative reconstruction and feature set for the classifier with the best diagnostic performance among all reconstructions and feature sets. Then, we conducted an observer study with six radiologists using a subset of breast lesions ( N = 50). Using 1000 bootstrap samples, we compared the diagnostic performance of the trained classifier to those of the radiologists. Result The diagnostic performance of the trained classifier increased as the image sharpness of a given reconstruction increased. Among combinations of reconstructions and quantitative image feature sets, we selected one of the sharp reconstructions and three quantitative image feature sets with the first three highest diagnostic performances under LOOCV as the representative reconstruction and feature set for the classifier. The classifier on the representative reconstruction and feature set achieved better diagnostic performance with an area under the ROC curve ( AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI = [0.81, 0.98]) than those of the radiologists, where their maximum AUC was 0.78 (95% CI = [0.63, 0.90]). Moreover, the partial AUC, at 90% sensitivity or higher, of the classifier ( pAUC = 0.085 with 95% CI = [0.063, 0.094]) was statistically better ( P-value < 0.0001) than those of the radiologists (maximum pAUC = 0.009 with 95% CI = [0.003, 0.024]). Conclusion We found that image sharpness measure can be a good candidate to estimate the diagnostic performance of a given CADx algorithm. In addition, we found that there exists a reconstruction (i.e., sharp reconstruction) and a feature set that maximizes the diagnostic performance of a CADx algorithm. On this optimal representative reconstruction and feature set, the CADx algorithm outperformed radiologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Physics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=122988709 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/mp.12214 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 1846 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Breast cancer diagnosis Type: general – SubjectFull: Diagnostic imaging Type: general – SubjectFull: Image reconstruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Computers in medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Image quality analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Optimal reconstruction and quantitative image features for computer-aided diagnosis tools for breast CT. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lee, Juhun – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nishikawa, Robert M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Reiser, Ingrid – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Boone, John M. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2017 Type: published Y: 2017 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00942405 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 44 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Medical Physics Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |