An assessment of upper ocean salinity content from the Ocean Reanalyses Inter-comparison Project (ORA-IP).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: An assessment of upper ocean salinity content from the Ocean Reanalyses Inter-comparison Project (ORA-IP).
Authors: Shi, L.1 l.shi@bom.gov.au, Alves, O.1, Wedd, R.1, Balmaseda, M.2, Chang, Y., Chepurin, G.3, Ferry, N.4, Fujii, Y.5, Gaillard, F.6, Good, S.7, Guinehut, S.8, Haines, K.9, Hernandez, F., Lee, T.10, Palmer, M.7, Peterson, K.A.7, Masuda, S.11, Storto, A.12, Toyoda, T.5, Valdivieso, M.9
Source: Climate Dynamics. Aug2017, Vol. 49 Issue 3, p1009-1029. 21p.
Subjects: Seawater salinity, Mathematical models of oceanography, Ocean currents, Seasonal variations in the ocean
Geographic Terms: Pacific Ocean
Abstract: Many institutions worldwide have developed ocean reanalyses systems (ORAs) utilizing a variety of ocean models and assimilation techniques. However, the quality of salinity reanalyses arising from the various ORAs has not yet been comprehensively assessed. In this study, we assess the upper ocean salinity content (depth-averaged over 0-700 m) from 14 ORAs and 3 objective ocean analysis systems (OOAs) as part of the Ocean Reanalyses Intercomparison Project. Our results show that the best agreement between estimates of salinity from different ORAs is obtained in the tropical Pacific, likely due to relatively abundant atmospheric and oceanic observations in this region. The largest disagreement in salinity reanalyses is in the Southern Ocean along the Antarctic circumpolar current as a consequence of the sparseness of both atmospheric and oceanic observations in this region. The West Pacific warm pool is the largest region where the signal to noise ratio of reanalysed salinity anomalies is >1. Therefore, the current salinity reanalyses in the tropical Pacific Ocean may be more reliable than those in the Southern Ocean and regions along the western boundary currents. Moreover, we found that the assimilation of salinity in ocean regions with relatively strong ocean fronts is still a common problem as seen in most ORAs. The impact of the Argo data on the salinity reanalyses is visible, especially within the upper 500 m, where the interannual variability is large. The increasing trend in global-averaged salinity anomalies can only be found within the top 0-300 m layer, but with quite large diversity among different ORAs. Beneath the 300 m depth, the global-averaged salinity anomalies from most ORAs switch their trends from a slightly growing trend before 2002 to a decreasing trend after 2002. The rapid switch in the trend is most likely an artefact of the dramatic change in the observing system due to the implementation of Argo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Climate Dynamics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 124485365
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: An assessment of upper ocean salinity content from the Ocean Reanalyses Inter-comparison Project (ORA-IP).
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shi%2C+L%2E%22">Shi, L.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> l.shi@bom.gov.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alves%2C+O%2E%22">Alves, O.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wedd%2C+R%2E%22">Wedd, R.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Balmaseda%2C+M%2E%22">Balmaseda, M.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chang%2C+Y%2E%22">Chang, Y.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chepurin%2C+G%2E%22">Chepurin, G.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferry%2C+N%2E%22">Ferry, N.</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fujii%2C+Y%2E%22">Fujii, Y.</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gaillard%2C+F%2E%22">Gaillard, F.</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Good%2C+S%2E%22">Good, S.</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Guinehut%2C+S%2E%22">Guinehut, S.</searchLink><relatesTo>8</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Haines%2C+K%2E%22">Haines, K.</searchLink><relatesTo>9</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hernandez%2C+F%2E%22">Hernandez, F.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lee%2C+T%2E%22">Lee, T.</searchLink><relatesTo>10</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Palmer%2C+M%2E%22">Palmer, M.</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peterson%2C+K%2EA%2E%22">Peterson, K.A.</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Masuda%2C+S%2E%22">Masuda, S.</searchLink><relatesTo>11</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Storto%2C+A%2E%22">Storto, A.</searchLink><relatesTo>12</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Toyoda%2C+T%2E%22">Toyoda, T.</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Valdivieso%2C+M%2E%22">Valdivieso, M.</searchLink><relatesTo>9</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Climate+Dynamics%22">Climate Dynamics</searchLink>. Aug2017, Vol. 49 Issue 3, p1009-1029. 21p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Seawater+salinity%22">Seawater salinity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+models+of+oceanography%22">Mathematical models of oceanography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ocean+currents%22">Ocean currents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Seasonal+variations+in+the+ocean%22">Seasonal variations in the ocean</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pacific+Ocean%22">Pacific Ocean</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Many institutions worldwide have developed ocean reanalyses systems (ORAs) utilizing a variety of ocean models and assimilation techniques. However, the quality of salinity reanalyses arising from the various ORAs has not yet been comprehensively assessed. In this study, we assess the upper ocean salinity content (depth-averaged over 0-700 m) from 14 ORAs and 3 objective ocean analysis systems (OOAs) as part of the Ocean Reanalyses Intercomparison Project. Our results show that the best agreement between estimates of salinity from different ORAs is obtained in the tropical Pacific, likely due to relatively abundant atmospheric and oceanic observations in this region. The largest disagreement in salinity reanalyses is in the Southern Ocean along the Antarctic circumpolar current as a consequence of the sparseness of both atmospheric and oceanic observations in this region. The West Pacific warm pool is the largest region where the signal to noise ratio of reanalysed salinity anomalies is >1. Therefore, the current salinity reanalyses in the tropical Pacific Ocean may be more reliable than those in the Southern Ocean and regions along the western boundary currents. Moreover, we found that the assimilation of salinity in ocean regions with relatively strong ocean fronts is still a common problem as seen in most ORAs. The impact of the Argo data on the salinity reanalyses is visible, especially within the upper 500 m, where the interannual variability is large. The increasing trend in global-averaged salinity anomalies can only be found within the top 0-300 m layer, but with quite large diversity among different ORAs. Beneath the 300 m depth, the global-averaged salinity anomalies from most ORAs switch their trends from a slightly growing trend before 2002 to a decreasing trend after 2002. The rapid switch in the trend is most likely an artefact of the dramatic change in the observing system due to the implementation of Argo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Climate Dynamics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=124485365
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00382-015-2868-7
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 1009
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Seawater salinity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematical models of oceanography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ocean currents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Seasonal variations in the ocean
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pacific Ocean
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: An assessment of upper ocean salinity content from the Ocean Reanalyses Inter-comparison Project (ORA-IP).
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shi, L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Alves, O.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wedd, R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Balmaseda, M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chang, Y.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chepurin, G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ferry, N.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fujii, Y.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gaillard, F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Good, S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Guinehut, S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Haines, K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hernandez, F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lee, T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Palmer, M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Peterson, K.A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Masuda, S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Storto, A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Toyoda, T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Valdivieso, M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2017
              Type: published
              Y: 2017
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09307575
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 49
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Climate Dynamics
              Type: main
ResultId 1