On the limitations of 2D CFD for thin-rectangular fluidized bed simulations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: On the limitations of 2D CFD for thin-rectangular fluidized bed simulations.
Authors: Bakshi, A.1,2 abakshi@mit.edu, Altantzis, C.1,2, Bershanska, A.1, Stark, A.K.1,3, Ghoniem, A.F.1
Source: Powder Technology. Jun2018, Vol. 332, p114-119. 6p.
Subjects: Computational fluid dynamics, Fluidized bed reactors, Hydrodynamics, Energy dissipation, Boundary value problems
Abstract: Thin rectangular fluidized beds enable detailed optical diagnostics providing high quality data for validating numerical simulations. Because of their lower computational costs, 2D CFD continues to be employed despite the high wall surface-area to bed-volume ratio characterizing this geometric setup. 2D simulations do not resolve the gas and solids flow in the third (spanwise) direction nor the true boundary condition along the front and back walls, both of which are critical because the hydrodynamics are significantly affected by the presence these walls whose surface area is often much larger than the walls modeled in 2D analyses. Through highly-resolved simulations of three independent experimental setups, we show that 2D CFD may not capture, even qualitatively, the fluidization hydrodynamics because (a) bubble rise and coalescence mechanisms along the spanwise direction are not resolved, and (b) solids momentum and energy dissipation are under-predicted, and bubble rise velocities are over-predicted, because effects of the front and back walls are not modeled. 3D simulations with suitable wall boundary conditions predict bubbling dynamics and solids mixing in excellent agreement with experimental observations without further tuning of model parameters. Overall, we recommended that 3D numerical simulations be employed to model thin lab-scale setups for model development and validation purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Powder Technology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 129373426
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: On the limitations of 2D CFD for thin-rectangular fluidized bed simulations.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bakshi%2C+A%2E%22">Bakshi, A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><i> abakshi@mit.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Altantzis%2C+C%2E%22">Altantzis, C.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bershanska%2C+A%2E%22">Bershanska, A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stark%2C+A%2EK%2E%22">Stark, A.K.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ghoniem%2C+A%2EF%2E%22">Ghoniem, A.F.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Powder+Technology%22">Powder Technology</searchLink>. Jun2018, Vol. 332, p114-119. 6p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computational+fluid+dynamics%22">Computational fluid dynamics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fluidized+bed+reactors%22">Fluidized bed reactors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hydrodynamics%22">Hydrodynamics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Energy+dissipation%22">Energy dissipation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Boundary+value+problems%22">Boundary value problems</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Thin rectangular fluidized beds enable detailed optical diagnostics providing high quality data for validating numerical simulations. Because of their lower computational costs, 2D CFD continues to be employed despite the high wall surface-area to bed-volume ratio characterizing this geometric setup. 2D simulations do not resolve the gas and solids flow in the third (spanwise) direction nor the true boundary condition along the front and back walls, both of which are critical because the hydrodynamics are significantly affected by the presence these walls whose surface area is often much larger than the walls modeled in 2D analyses. Through highly-resolved simulations of three independent experimental setups, we show that 2D CFD may not capture, even qualitatively, the fluidization hydrodynamics because (a) bubble rise and coalescence mechanisms along the spanwise direction are not resolved, and (b) solids momentum and energy dissipation are under-predicted, and bubble rise velocities are over-predicted, because effects of the front and back walls are not modeled. 3D simulations with suitable wall boundary conditions predict bubbling dynamics and solids mixing in excellent agreement with experimental observations without further tuning of model parameters. Overall, we recommended that 3D numerical simulations be employed to model thin lab-scale setups for model development and validation purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Powder Technology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=129373426
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.03.048
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 114
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Computational fluid dynamics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Fluidized bed reactors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hydrodynamics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Energy dissipation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Boundary value problems
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: On the limitations of 2D CFD for thin-rectangular fluidized bed simulations.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bakshi, A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Altantzis, C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bershanska, A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stark, A.K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ghoniem, A.F.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2018
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00325910
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 332
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Powder Technology
              Type: main
ResultId 1