Assessment of bias errors caused by texture and sampling methods in diffraction‐based steel phase measurements.
Saved in:
| Title: | Assessment of bias errors caused by texture and sampling methods in diffraction‐based steel phase measurements. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Creuziger, Adam1 adam.creuziger@nist.gov, Calhoun, Christopher A.1, Poling, Whitney A.1, Gnäupel-Herold, Thomas2 |
| Source: | Journal of Applied Crystallography. Jun2018, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p720-731. 11p. |
| Subjects: | Sampling methods, Austenite, Phase separation, Ionizing radiation, Aluminum alloys, X-ray diffraction |
| Abstract: | Many advanced high‐strength steels rely on a metastable austenite phase for improvements in strength and formability. To date, no method has demonstrated the ability to provide accurate austenite phase fraction measurements in textured steels. Several techniques have been proposed, such as averaging the intensity of several peaks and/or summation of intensity from several sample orientations. The series of numerical experiments performed in this work sought to quantify the effects of texture on the measurement of the austenite phase fraction, with an emphasis on techniques suitable for laboratory X‐ray diffraction. Simulated diffraction profiles were created with the following variables: texture components for the ferrite and austenite phases, the sharpness of each of the texture components, the number of peaks used for averaging in the phase fraction calculation, and the sampling scheme used for sample orientation summation in the phase fraction calculation. The resulting phase fraction calculations showed that texture, the number of peak pairs and the sampling method have a drastic effect on phase fraction measurements, causing significant bias errors. Hexagonal grids produced minimal bias errors and demonstrated a robust method of measuring phase fractions in textured materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Applied Crystallography is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 130000776 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Assessment of bias errors caused by texture and sampling methods in diffraction‐based steel phase measurements. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Creuziger%2C+Adam%22">Creuziger, Adam</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> adam.creuziger@nist.gov</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Calhoun%2C+Christopher+A%2E%22">Calhoun, Christopher A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Poling%2C+Whitney+A%2E%22">Poling, Whitney A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gnäupel-Herold%2C+Thomas%22">Gnäupel-Herold, Thomas</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Applied+Crystallography%22">Journal of Applied Crystallography</searchLink>. Jun2018, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p720-731. 11p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sampling+methods%22">Sampling methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Austenite%22">Austenite</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Phase+separation%22">Phase separation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ionizing+radiation%22">Ionizing radiation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Aluminum+alloys%22">Aluminum alloys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22X-ray+diffraction%22">X-ray diffraction</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Many advanced high‐strength steels rely on a metastable austenite phase for improvements in strength and formability. To date, no method has demonstrated the ability to provide accurate austenite phase fraction measurements in textured steels. Several techniques have been proposed, such as averaging the intensity of several peaks and/or summation of intensity from several sample orientations. The series of numerical experiments performed in this work sought to quantify the effects of texture on the measurement of the austenite phase fraction, with an emphasis on techniques suitable for laboratory X‐ray diffraction. Simulated diffraction profiles were created with the following variables: texture components for the ferrite and austenite phases, the sharpness of each of the texture components, the number of peaks used for averaging in the phase fraction calculation, and the sampling scheme used for sample orientation summation in the phase fraction calculation. The resulting phase fraction calculations showed that texture, the number of peak pairs and the sampling method have a drastic effect on phase fraction measurements, causing significant bias errors. Hexagonal grids produced minimal bias errors and demonstrated a robust method of measuring phase fractions in textured materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Applied Crystallography is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=130000776 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1107/S160057671800420X Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 720 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Sampling methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Austenite Type: general – SubjectFull: Phase separation Type: general – SubjectFull: Ionizing radiation Type: general – SubjectFull: Aluminum alloys Type: general – SubjectFull: X-ray diffraction Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Assessment of bias errors caused by texture and sampling methods in diffraction‐based steel phase measurements. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Creuziger, Adam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Calhoun, Christopher A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Poling, Whitney A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gnäupel-Herold, Thomas IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2018 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00218898 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 51 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Applied Crystallography Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |