View in EDS

Herbaceous phytoliths from forest and grassland in Northeast China: Potential significance for determining past forest–grassland boundaries.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Herbaceous phytoliths from forest and grassland in Northeast China: Potential significance for determining past forest–grassland boundaries.
Authors: Li, De-Hui1,2, Jie, Dong-Mei1,2,3 jiedongmei@nenu.edu.cn, Liu, Li-Dan4, Liu, Hong-Yan5, Gao, Gui-Zai1,2, Gao, Zhuo1,2, Li, Nan-Nan1,2
Source: Flora. Jun2018, Vol. 243, p19-31. 13p.
Subjects: Herbaceous plants, Phytoliths, Grasslands, Grasses, Discriminant analysis
Abstract: Phytoliths are a useful tool for reconstructing paleovegetation and paleoenvironments and grass short cell phytoliths (GSCPs), in particular, can provide important paleoenvironmental information. Although herbaceous phytoliths from non-grass species in forests also provide important paleovegetation information, they have not been investigated in as much detail as GSCPs, especially in Northeast China. In this study, we examined herbaceous phytolith morphotypes and assemblages from both forested and grassland areas in NE China, comprising three vegetation types. The phytoliths in 60 herbaceous quadrats were divided into seven morphotype groups. Cross-shaped phytoliths, bilobate type-C with long shank and papillate echinate morphotypes were only observed in grassland (GRA); complex saddle and bilobate type-A were only observed in non-understory vegetation in forested areas (NON); and phytoliths with scrobiculate decoration, elongate curved, silicified stoma (F), silicified stoma (D), globular granulate and oblong ruminate were only observed in forest understory (UND). Papillate (39.7%) was the dominant phytolith type in UND assemblages, and bilobate was dominant in NON (27.2%) and GRA (55.0%). According to the results of Discriminant Analysis (DA) and Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA), there was no similarity between UND and GRA, while NON had similarities with both UND and GRA. We conclude that herbaceous phytolith morphotypes and assemblages from forest and grassland in NE China are substantially different, which potentially enables their use for paleovegetation reconstruction in the region. Overall, our findings provide a new approach for determining past forest–grassland boundaries in NE China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Flora is the property of Urban & Fischer Verlag and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Phytoliths are a useful tool for reconstructing paleovegetation and paleoenvironments and grass short cell phytoliths (GSCPs), in particular, can provide important paleoenvironmental information. Although herbaceous phytoliths from non-grass species in forests also provide important paleovegetation information, they have not been investigated in as much detail as GSCPs, especially in Northeast China. In this study, we examined herbaceous phytolith morphotypes and assemblages from both forested and grassland areas in NE China, comprising three vegetation types. The phytoliths in 60 herbaceous quadrats were divided into seven morphotype groups. Cross-shaped phytoliths, bilobate type-C with long shank and papillate echinate morphotypes were only observed in grassland (GRA); complex saddle and bilobate type-A were only observed in non-understory vegetation in forested areas (NON); and phytoliths with scrobiculate decoration, elongate curved, silicified stoma (F), silicified stoma (D), globular granulate and oblong ruminate were only observed in forest understory (UND). Papillate (39.7%) was the dominant phytolith type in UND assemblages, and bilobate was dominant in NON (27.2%) and GRA (55.0%). According to the results of Discriminant Analysis (DA) and Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA), there was no similarity between UND and GRA, while NON had similarities with both UND and GRA. We conclude that herbaceous phytolith morphotypes and assemblages from forest and grassland in NE China are substantially different, which potentially enables their use for paleovegetation reconstruction in the region. Overall, our findings provide a new approach for determining past forest–grassland boundaries in NE China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:03672530
DOI:10.1016/j.flora.2018.03.012