A diachronic study of historiography.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A diachronic study of historiography.
Authors: Colavizza, Giovanni1
Source: Scientometrics. Dec2018, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p2117-2131. 15p.
Subjects: Bibliographic coupling, Humanities libraries, Humanities literature, Sociologists, Communication network analysis
Abstract: The humanities are often characterized by sociologists as having a low mutual dependence among scholars and high task uncertainty. According to Fuchs' theory of scientific change, this leads over time to intellectual and social fragmentation, as new scholarship accumulates in the absence of shared unifying theories. We consider here a set of specialisms in the discipline of history and measure the connectivity properties of their bibliographic coupling networks over time, in order to assess whether fragmentation is indeed occurring. We construct networks using both reference overlap and textual similarity. It is shown that the connectivity of reference overlap networks is gradually and steadily declining over time, whilst that of textual similarity networks is stable. Author bibliographic coupling networks also show signs of a decline in connectivity, in the absence of an increasing propensity for collaborations. We speculate that, despite the gradual weakening of ties among historians as mapped by references, new scholarship might be continually integrated through shared vocabularies and narratives. This would support our belief that citations are but one kind of bibliometric data to consider—perhaps even of secondary importance—when studying the humanities, while text should play a more prominent role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Scientometrics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 133311982
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A diachronic study of historiography.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Colavizza%2C+Giovanni%22">Colavizza, Giovanni</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Scientometrics%22">Scientometrics</searchLink>. Dec2018, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p2117-2131. 15p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bibliographic+coupling%22">Bibliographic coupling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Humanities+libraries%22">Humanities libraries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Humanities+literature%22">Humanities literature</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sociologists%22">Sociologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication+network+analysis%22">Communication network analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The humanities are often characterized by sociologists as having a low mutual dependence among scholars and high task uncertainty. According to Fuchs' theory of scientific change, this leads over time to intellectual and social fragmentation, as new scholarship accumulates in the absence of shared unifying theories. We consider here a set of specialisms in the discipline of history and measure the connectivity properties of their bibliographic coupling networks over time, in order to assess whether fragmentation is indeed occurring. We construct networks using both reference overlap and textual similarity. It is shown that the connectivity of reference overlap networks is gradually and steadily declining over time, whilst that of textual similarity networks is stable. Author bibliographic coupling networks also show signs of a decline in connectivity, in the absence of an increasing propensity for collaborations. We speculate that, despite the gradual weakening of ties among historians as mapped by references, new scholarship might be continually integrated through shared vocabularies and narratives. This would support our belief that citations are but one kind of bibliometric data to consider—perhaps even of secondary importance—when studying the humanities, while text should play a more prominent role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Scientometrics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=133311982
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11192-018-2934-0
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 2117
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Bibliographic coupling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Humanities libraries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Humanities literature
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sociologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communication network analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A diachronic study of historiography.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Colavizza, Giovanni
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2018
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01389130
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 117
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Scientometrics
              Type: main
ResultId 1